Levels of use of Interactive Whiteboard technology in the primary mathematics classroom

Despite the availability of Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) technology in a large number of Australian primary schools, many teachers focus only on technical issues as opposed to pedagogical engagement in an attempt to incorporate the technology. Previous research suggests that the technology is being used for sophisticated transmission-style teaching as opposed to constructivist approaches. This article presents findings of a project that considered the implementation of IWB technology in three Victorian primary mathematics classrooms (5 to 12 years of age). The study analysed the teaching strategies adopted by three teachers as they embarked on the use of IWB technology as an integral component of mathematical activities with the support of professional development. Teacher use of IWB technology in the primary mathematics classroom was aligned against Beauchamp’s generic transitional framework for viewing the development of teacher use of IWB technology. Through this alignment, a transitional framework emerged which is specific to the introduction of IWB technology in the mathematics classroom.

[1]  P. John,et al.  Devices and desires: subject subcultures, pedagogical identity and the challenge of information and communications technology , 2004 .

[2]  Laurence Rogers,et al.  Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: how are science teachers meeting the challenge? , 2004 .

[3]  Ian Hall,et al.  Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Interactive whiteboards and all that jazz: the contribution of musical metaphors to the analysis of classroom activity with interactive technologies , 2010 .

[5]  Mary Webb,et al.  A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology , 2004 .

[6]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective transition framework , 2004 .

[7]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[8]  S. Higgins,et al.  The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Teacher--Pupil Interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. , 2006 .

[9]  Noleine Fitzallen,et al.  Integrating ICT into Professional Practice: A Case Study of Four Mathematics Teachers , 2005 .

[10]  Howard Tanner,et al.  Using video‐stimulated reflective dialogue to learn from children about their learning with and without ICT , 2007 .

[11]  P. M. Hiele.  Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education , 1985 .

[12]  Boon Liang Chua,et al.  Designing Technology-Based Mathematics Lessons: A Pedagogical Framework , 2005 .

[13]  Steve Kennewell.  KEN06138 Reflections on the interactive whiteboard phenomenon: a synthesis of research from the UK , 2006 .

[14]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy, and Pupil Performance: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (London Challenge) , 2007 .

[15]  Ann Gervasoni,et al.  Early Numeracy Research Project Final Report, February, 2002 , 2002 .

[16]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Pupil perspectives on the contribution of information and communication technology to teaching and learning in the secondary school , 2003 .

[17]  Derek Glover,et al.  Into the unknown: the professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology , 2007 .