A novel flapless approach versus minimally invasive surgery in periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative proteins: a 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial

[1]  Y. Tu,et al.  Minimally invasive non-surgical approach for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a retrospective analysis. , 2015, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  C. Bignardi,et al.  Osseous resective surgery with and without fibre retention technique in the treatment of shallow intrabony defects: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  L. Trombelli,et al.  Single-flap approach in combination with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. , 2014, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[4]  P. Cortellini.  Minimally invasive surgical techniques in periodontal regeneration. , 2012, The journal of evidence-based dental practice.

[5]  W. Giannobile,et al.  Advanced reconstructive technologies for periodontal tissue repair. , 2012, Periodontology 2000.

[6]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in reconstructive periodontal therapy: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  F. V. Ribeiro,et al.  Clinical and patient-centered outcomes after minimally invasive non-surgical or surgical approaches for the treatment of intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  R. Miron,et al.  Enamel Matrix Proteins and Periodontal Wound Healing and Regeneration. , 2011, Clinical advances in periodontics.

[9]  F. V. Ribeiro,et al.  The role of enamel matrix derivative protein in minimally invasive surgery in treating intrabony defects in single-rooted teeth: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with and without regenerative materials: a randomized-controlled trial in intra-bony defects. , 2011, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[11]  S. Harrel,et al.  Minimally invasive periodontal therapy: will periodontal therapy remain a technologic laggard? , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  M. Nunn,et al.  Prospective assessment of the use of enamel matrix derivative with minimally invasive surgery: 6-year results. , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  D. Cochran,et al.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of non-surgical periodontal therapy with enamel matrix derivative: a report of four cases. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  M. Nieri,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intrabony defects: 2. Factors associated with healing outcomes. , 2009, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[15]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Improved wound stability with a modified minimally invasive surgical technique in the regenerative treatment of isolated interdental intrabony defects. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  L. Trombelli,et al.  Single-flap approach with buccal access in periodontal reconstructive procedures. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  D. Bosshardt.  Biological mediators and periodontal regeneration: a review of enamel matrix proteins at the cellular and molecular levels. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Clinical outcomes after treatment of intra-bony defects with an EMD/synthetic bone graft or EMD alone: a multicentre randomized-controlled clinical trial. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: Clinical outcomes and morbidity. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  B. Mealey,et al.  The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing: an evaluation of therapy with and without the use of the periodontal endoscope. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  P. Coulthard,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  A. Mombelli,et al.  Enamel matrix proteins and systemic antibiotics as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal treatment: clinical effects. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  M. Nunn,et al.  Prospective assessment of the use of enamel matrix proteins with minimally invasive surgery. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[24]  L. Heitz‐Mayfield.  How effective is surgical therapy compared with nonsurgical debridement? , 2005, Periodontology 2000.

[25]  N. Lang,et al.  Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects. , 2004, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[26]  B. Boyan,et al.  The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: a literature review and meta-analysis. , 2004, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[27]  P. Adriaens,et al.  Effects of nonsurgical periodontal therapy on hard and soft tissues. , 2004, Periodontology 2000.

[28]  T. Testori,et al.  Enamel matrix proteins in the treatment of intra-bony defects. A prospective 24-month clinical trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[29]  M. Somerman,et al.  Growth and amelogenin-like factors in periodontal wound healing. A systematic review. , 2003, Annals of periodontology.

[30]  D. Cochran,et al.  Evaluation of enamel matrix derivative as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[31]  A. Sculean,et al.  Histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects following non-surgical periodontal therapy with and without application of an enamel matrix protein derivative. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[32]  I Needleman,et al.  A systematic review of the effect of surgical debridement vs non-surgical debridement for the treatment of chronic periodontitis. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[33]  A. Sculean,et al.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain). , 2000, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[34]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Histologic evaluation of periodontal healing in humans following regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative. A 10-case series. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[35]  G. Armitage,et al.  Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. , 1999, Annals of periodontology.

[36]  J. Mellonig.  Enamel matrix derivative for periodontal reconstructive surgery: technique and clinical and histologic case report. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[37]  G. Heden,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[38]  L. Hammarström,et al.  Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[39]  L. Heijl.  Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[40]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Factors affecting the healing response of intrabony defects following guided tissue regeneration and access flap surgery. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[41]  B. Mealey,et al.  The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth. , 1993, Journal of periodontology.

[42]  P. McMillan,et al.  Periodontal repair in dogs: expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes support wound stabilization and enhance bone regeneration. , 1993, Journal of periodontology.

[43]  K. Selvig,et al.  Significance of early healing events on periodontal repair: a review. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[44]  U. Wikesjö,et al.  Periodontal repair in dogs: effect of wound stabilization on healing. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[45]  P. R. Sherman,et al.  The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planning. I. Clinical detection of residual calculus. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[46]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Scaling and root planing efficacy in multirooted teeth. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[47]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Scaling and root planing effectiveness: the effect of root surface access and operator experience. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[48]  M. Ash,et al.  The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal. , 1981, Journal of periodontology.

[49]  O. Schei,et al.  Alveolar Bone Loss as Related to Oral Hygiene and Age , 1959 .