Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum

SUMMARY 1. The impact of agricultural activities on waterways is a global issue, but the magnitude of the problem is often not clearly recognized by landowners, and land and water management agencies. 2. The Pomahaka River in southern New Zealand represents a typical lowland catchment with a long history of agricultural development. Fifteen sites were sampled along a 119-km stretch of the river. Headwater sites were surrounded by low-intensity sheep farming, with high-intensity pasture and dairying occurring in the mid-reach and lower reaches. 3. Water clarity decreased significantly from about 6 m in the headwaters to less than 2 m in the lower reaches. Benthic sediment levels increased significantly downriver, peaking at 35 mg mT 2 below several tributaries with high-intensity agriculture in their catchments. Periphyton levels were also significantly greater in the lower reaches than the headwaters, and coincided with increased nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (SRP) concentrations. 4. Macro-invertebrate species richness did not change significantly throughout the river, but species composition did with Ephemeroptera, and to a lesser extent, Plecoptera and Trichoptera dominating the headwater sites (where there was high water clarity, and low nutrient and periphyton levels). Downriver these assemblages were replaced by molluscs, oligochaetes and chironomids. 5. Canonical correspondence analysis indicated that agricultural intensity and physical conditions associated with agriculture activity (e.g. impacted waters, high turbidity and temperature) were strongly associated with the composition of benthic assemblages at differing reaches down the Pomahaka River. 6. The present results indicate that quantifying agricultural intensity within a catchment, particularly relative livestock densities, may provide a useful tool for identifying threshold levels above which river health declines.

[1]  K. Cummins,et al.  Trophic Relations of Aquatic Insects , 1973 .

[2]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[3]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems , 1983 .

[4]  G. Minshall,et al.  Relationships among chemical, physical, and biological indices along river continua based on multivariate analyses , 1983 .

[5]  G. Minshall,et al.  INTERBIOME COMPARISON OF STREAM ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS , 1983 .

[6]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  Food resources and ingestion patterns of insects along a West Coast, South Island, river system , 1984 .

[7]  B. Statzner,et al.  Questions and Comments on the River Continuum Concept , 1985 .

[8]  R. Davies‐Colley,et al.  Measuring water clarity with a black disk , 1988 .

[9]  F. Sabater,et al.  Measuring discontinuities in the ter river , 1989 .

[10]  B. Biggs,et al.  Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: the relative effects of flows and nutrients , 1989 .

[11]  Christopher W. Hickey,et al.  Magnitude of effects of substrate particle size, recent flooding, and catchment development on benthic invertebrates in 88 New Zealand rivers , 1990 .

[12]  R. Davies‐Colley,et al.  Baseflow water chemistry in New Zealand rivers. 1. Characterisation. , 1990 .

[13]  M. Wiley,et al.  Longitudinal Structure of an Agricultural Prairie River System and its Relationship to Current Stream Ecosystem Theory , 1990 .

[14]  J. Richardson,et al.  Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates in a New Zealand river and the development of in‐stream flow‐habitat models for Deleatidium spp. , 1990 .

[15]  J. Harding.  Discontinuities in the distribution of invertebrates in impounded south island rivers, New Zealand , 1992 .

[16]  M. Delong,et al.  Patterns of Periphyton Chlorophyll ? in AN Agricultural Nonpoint Source Impacted Stream , 1992 .

[17]  T. Northcote,et al.  Surface, planktonic, and benthic foraging by juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in turbid laboratory conditions , 1993 .

[18]  National Research Council,et al.  Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1993 .

[19]  Alexander S. Flecker,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in running waters , 1993 .

[20]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  Effects of agricultural development on processing of tussock leaf litter in high country New Zealand streams , 1994 .

[21]  M. Delong,et al.  Allochthonous input of organic matter from different riparian habitats of an agriculturally impacted stream , 1994 .

[22]  B. Biggs,et al.  Responses of two trophic levels to patch enrichment along a New Zealand stream continuum , 1994 .

[23]  B. Biggs,et al.  The contribution of flood disturbance, catchment geology and land use to the habitat template of periphyton in stream ecosystems , 1995 .

[24]  J. Harding,et al.  Effects of contrasting land use on physico‐chemical conditions and benthic assemblages of streams in a Canterbury (South Island, New Zealand) river system , 1995 .

[25]  J. B. Wallace,et al.  Longitudinal changes of macroinvertebrate communities along an Appalachian stream continuum , 1996 .

[26]  A. Huryn,et al.  Interannual variation in discharge controls ecosystem metabolism along a grassland river continuum , 1996 .

[27]  John Lyons,et al.  Influences of Watershed Land Use on Habitat Quality and Biotic Integrity in Wisconsin Streams , 1997 .

[28]  W. Parton,et al.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. , 1997, Science.

[29]  David Pimentel,et al.  Water Resources: Agriculture, the Environment, and Society , 1997 .

[30]  J. Harding,et al.  Stream faunas and ecoregions in South island, New Zealand: do they correspond? , 1997 .

[31]  M. Delong,et al.  Macroinvertebrate Community Structure Along the Longitudinal Gradient of an Agriculturally Impacted Stream , 1998, Environmental management.

[32]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .