Vegetation‐hydrology dynamics in complex terrain of semiarid areas: 2. Energy‐water controls of vegetation spatiotemporal dynamics and topographic niches of favorability

Ecosystems of dry climates are a particularly interesting subject for ecohydrological studies, as water is generally considered to be the key limiting resource. This work focuses on vegetation‐water‐energy dynamics occurring on the complex terrain of a semiarid area characteristic of central New Mexico. The study employs a mechanistic model of coupled interactions to construct a set of numerical experiments carried out for two small‐scale synthetic domains that exhibit particular hillslope curvatures. The linkages between terrain attributes and patterns of C4 grass productivity and water balance components are examined for three generic soil types. It is argued that in conditions of negligible moisture exchange, aspect and slope are the key determinants of both the hydrologic behavior and the degree of site “favorability” to vegetation. Certain topographic locations are more favorable to vegetation, as compared to a flat horizontal surface not influenced by lateral effects. These locations are associated with sites of northerly aspect with surface slopes within a narrow range of magnitudes. Contributions from both rainfall and radiation forcings are discussed to explain the existence of these topographic niches. The sensitivity of results is investigated by modifying the dominant mechanism of lateral water transfer. Two additional controlling topographic features are explored, corresponding to the contiguous and global terrain convergence levels. It is argued that their effects on vegetation‐hydrology dynamics at a given location are characteristically superimposed with the impact of site‐specific terrain attributes. Furthermore, the results lead to a conceptual relationship linking vegetation‐hydrology quantities at different landscape locations.

[1]  D. Scott Mackay,et al.  Evaluation of hydrologic equilibrium in a mountainous watershed: incorporating forest canopy spatial adjustment to soil biogeochemical processes , 2001 .

[2]  D. Tongway,et al.  VEGETATION PATCHES AND RUNOFF–EROSION AS INTERACTING ECOHYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN SEMIARID LANDSCAPES , 2005 .

[3]  R. A. Vertessy,et al.  Long-term growth and water balance predictions for a mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forest catchment subject to clear-felling and regeneration. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[4]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 2. Is the concept realistic? , 1992 .

[5]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[6]  Nicole M. Gasparini,et al.  The Channel-Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development Model (CHILD) , 2001 .

[7]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types , 1996 .

[8]  S. Breckle,et al.  Walter’s Vegetation of the Earth , 2002 .

[9]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Overland Flow: Hydraulics and Erosion Mechanics , 2007 .

[10]  Galina A. Kuryakova,et al.  Influence of topography on some vegetation cover properties , 1996 .

[11]  E. Hamilton,et al.  A comparative study of rain‐gages , 1943 .

[12]  Salvatore Manfreda,et al.  On the coupled geomorphological and ecohydrological organization of river basins , 2003 .

[13]  R. Bras,et al.  Vegetation-modulated landscape evolution: Effects of vegetation on landscape processes, drainage density, and topography , 2004 .

[14]  Gregory E. Tucker,et al.  A stochastic approach to modeling the role of rainfall variability in drainage basin evolution , 2000 .

[15]  B. Bonan,et al.  A Land Surface Model (LSM Version 1.0) for Ecological, Hydrological, and Atmospheric Studies: Technical Description and User's Guide , 1996 .

[16]  G. Salvucci,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of groundwater–vadose zone interactions and the resulting spatial distribution of hydrologic fluxes across a Canadian Prairie , 1999 .

[17]  J. Poesen Mechanisms of overland-flow generation and sediment production on loamy and sandy soils with and without rock fragments , 1992 .

[18]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[19]  R. Grant Modeling topographic effects on net ecosystem productivity of boreal black spruce forests. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[20]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Desert Ecosystems: Environment and Producers , 1973 .

[21]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: dynamic coupling of distributed hydrology and canopy growth , 1997 .

[22]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain , 1994 .

[23]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0) , 1997 .

[24]  EK VIV,et al.  A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models , 2004 .

[25]  J. Poesen,et al.  Numerical simulation of the wind-driven rainfall distribution over small-scale topography in space and time , 2005 .

[26]  D. C. Curtis,et al.  A weather generator for hydrological, ecological, and agricultural applications , 2007 .

[27]  V. Isham,et al.  Probabilistic modelling of water balance at a point: the role of climate, soil and vegetation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  A. Protopapas,et al.  State‐space dynamic hydrological modeling of soil‐crop‐climate interactions , 1988 .

[29]  D. Hall,et al.  Productivity of Tropical Savannas and Grasslands , 2001 .

[30]  W. Dietrich,et al.  The search for a topographic signature of life , 2006, Nature.

[31]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[32]  R. Bras,et al.  A MODEL FOR WATER UPTAKE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ROOT SYSTEMS , 1987 .

[33]  Ross K. Meentemeyer,et al.  Landscape-scale patterns of shrub-species abundance in California chaparral – The role of topographically mediated resource gradients , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[34]  Mariana Vertenstein,et al.  The Community Land Model's Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM-DGVM): Technical description and user's guide , 2004 .

[35]  E. Hamilton Rainfall Sampling on Rugged Terrain , 1954 .

[36]  D. Entekhabi,et al.  Groundwater-surface water interaction and the climatic spatial patterns of hillslope hydrological response , 1999 .

[37]  S. Running,et al.  Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: incorporating hillslope hydrology , 1993 .

[38]  H. G. Fourcade SOME NOTES ON THE EFFECTS OF THE INCIDENCE OF RAIN ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL OVER THE SURFACE OF UNLEVEL GROUND , 1942 .

[39]  W. Larcher Physiological Plant Ecology , 1977 .

[40]  C. Justice,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data , 1996 .

[41]  D. Hall,et al.  Primary productivity of natural grass ecosystems of the tropics: A reappraisal , 1989, Plant and Soil.

[42]  Enrique R. Vivoni,et al.  Vegetation‐hydrology dynamics in complex terrain of semiarid areas: 1. A mechanistic approach to modeling dynamic feedbacks , 2008 .

[43]  Ragab Ragab,et al.  Experimental study of water fluxes in a residential area: 1. Rainfall, roof runoff and evaporation: the effect of slope and aspect , 2003 .

[44]  D. Sharon,et al.  The distribution of hydrologically effective rainfall incident on sloping ground , 1980 .

[45]  Steven R. Archer,et al.  Scale-Dependent Influence of Topography-Based Hydrologic Features on Patterns of Woody Plant Encroachment in Savanna Landscapes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  Peter Caccetta,et al.  Vegetation distribution in relation to topographically driven processes in southwestern Australia , 2002 .

[47]  A. D. Abrahams,et al.  Modeling runoff and runon in a desert shrubland ecosystem, Jornada Basin, New Mexico , 2003 .

[48]  J. Franklin Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain‐derived variables , 1998 .

[49]  Michael T. Coe,et al.  Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure , 2000 .

[50]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Modelling the links between vegetation and landforms , 1995 .

[51]  D. Sharon,et al.  The distribution of wind-driven rainfall in a small valley: an empirical basis for numerical model verification , 1997 .

[52]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Estimation of Soil Water Properties , 1982 .

[53]  M. Roberts,et al.  Primary productivity of grass ecosystems of the tropics and sub-tropics , 1993 .

[54]  V. Ivanov Effects of dynamic vegetation and topography on hydrological processes in semi-arid areas , 2006 .

[55]  I. Moore Effect of Surface Sealing on Infiltration , 1980 .

[56]  B. Ambroise Topography and the water cycle in a temperate middle mountain environment: the need for interdisciplinary experiments , 1995 .

[57]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Stochastic soil moisture dynamics along a hillslope , 2003 .

[58]  T. Schmugge,et al.  Remote sensing in hydrology , 2002 .