An assessment of the ecological impacts of inter‐basin water transfers, and their threats to river basin integrity and conservation

1. Detailed research into the ecological impacts of inter-basin water transfers (IBTs) is virtually nonexistent on a global scale. However, a growing awareness of the serious nature of such impacts—for example, the loss of biogeographical integrity, the loss of endemic biotas, the frequent introduction of alien and often invasive aquatic and terrestrial plants and animals, the genetic intermixing of once separated populations, the implications for water quality, the frequently drastic alteration of hydrological regimes, the implications for marine and estuarine processes, climatic effects, and the spread of disease vectors, amongst many others—demands a most urgent and world-wide appraisal of all current planning and research strategies. 2. This paper first defines the types of extant IBTs, and details some case studies for three widely separated regions of the world, namely: south-eastern Australia, southern Africa, and the central and south-western parts of the United States of America. In doing so, it highlights the chronic paucity of ecological data on their impacts, while simultaneously emphasising their extreme complexities. 3. Finally, we call for an international meeting on such schemes, as a matter of priority and extreme urgency, in order to assess the extent of IBTs, their geographical distribution, and their ecological and sociological impacts and implications.

[1]  M. Imhof,et al.  Never Give a Sucker an Even Break , 1979 .

[2]  F. C. De Moor,et al.  Changes in the physico‐chemistry and benthic invertebrates of the great fish river, South Africa, following an interbasin transfer of water , 1988 .

[3]  T. Doeg,et al.  Response of the aquatic macroinvertebrate communities to dam construction on the Thomson river, Southeastern Australia , 1987 .

[4]  R. Lemmelä The Future of Hydrological Yearbooks and Data Publications (with a review of the National Water Summary 1985—Hydrological Events and Surface Water Resources: US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2300 (1986)) , 1988 .

[5]  J. Stanford,et al.  The Ecology of Regulated Streams , 1979, Springer US.

[6]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .

[7]  C. Hocutt,et al.  Colonisation theory and invasive biota: The great fish river, a case history , 1986, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[8]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[9]  L. Miller,et al.  The Decline of Striped Bass in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin Estuary, California , 1985 .

[10]  J. Cloern,et al.  The Modification of an Estuary , 1986, Science.

[11]  George W. Barnes,et al.  Water Supply Impact Analysis of Proposed Water Quality Control Plan for Salinity for San Francisco Bay and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary , 1991 .

[12]  R. Palmer,et al.  The effects of impoundment on the physicochemistry of two contrasting southern african river systems , 1990 .

[13]  J. Cambray,et al.  DISPERSAL OF FISHES VIA THE ORANGE-FISH TUNNEL, SOUTH AFRICA , 1977 .

[14]  Michael R. Meador Inter-basin Water Transfer: Ecological Concerns , 1992 .

[15]  Frank Quinn,et al.  WATER TRANSFERS — CANADIAN STYLE , 1981 .

[16]  B. R. Davies,et al.  The Ecology of River Systems , 1986, Monographiae Biologicae.

[17]  R. Jubb UNINTENTIONAL INTRODUCTIONS OF FISHES VIA HYDRO-ELECTRIC POWER STATIONS AND CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS , 1976 .

[18]  A. Biswas Long-distance water transfer: a Chinese case study and international experiences. , 1983 .

[19]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Australia v the world: a comparative analysis of streamflow characteristics , 1988 .

[20]  van Robbroeck Inter basin water transfers , 1985 .