Current-Level Discrimination in the Context of Interleaved, Multichannel Stimulation in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Number of Stimulated Electrodes, Pulse Rate, and Electrode Separation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Colette M McKay,et al. A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] R J Glynn,et al. Survival of Spiral Ganglion Cells in Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[3] J. Krystal,et al. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. , 2004, Archives of general psychiatry.
[4] G S Donaldson,et al. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] G M Clark,et al. Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Bryan E. Pfingst,et al. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants , 2005, Hearing Research.
[7] F B Simmons,et al. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.
[8] Robert K Shepherd,et al. Long‐term sensorineural hearing loss induces functional changes in the rat auditory nerve , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.
[9] R V Shannon,et al. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] J. Nadol,et al. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
[12] K. Plant,et al. Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.
[13] R. Shannon. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.
[14] William M. Rabinowitz,et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.
[15] G M Clark,et al. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] M. Gribskov,et al. [9] Profile analysis , 1990 .
[17] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.
[18] Colette M. McKay,et al. Psychophysics and Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .
[19] D Sutton,et al. Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] M. Dorman,et al. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Margaret W Skinner,et al. Nucleus® 24 Advanced Encoder Conversion Study: Performance versus Preference , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[22] Marco Pelizzone,et al. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Margaret W Skinner,et al. Effects of Stimulation Rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE Speech Coding Strategy , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[24] M. Gribskov,et al. Profile Analysis , 1970 .
[25] M. Pelizzone,et al. Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects , 2003, Hearing Research.
[26] Robert V. Shannon,et al. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.