Parameterization of ocean self‐attraction and loading in numerical models of the ocean circulation

[1] The effect of ocean self-attraction and loading (SAL) is considered in a global, barotropic ocean model forced by atmospheric wind stress, atmospheric pressure, and tidal forcing. Periods shorter than 7 days are considered. The model is integrated with a proper calculation of these effects in terms of a (very expensive) Green's function convolution at each time step. SAL effects produce a perturbation of typically about 10% of the computed ocean bottom pressure, but much more in places, for both tidal and atmospherically forced motions. An investigation into simple parameterizations of these effects by means of a term proportional to local bottom pressure reveals the following results: For tides, the best coefficient is systematically dependent on depth, ranging from less than 0.08 in shallow water to about 0.12 in the deepest water, and incorporating this effect improves the parameterization. For atmospherically forced motions, there is still some effect of depth but more an effect of latitude (increasingly so for longer periods), regional variation is greater, and correlation between the SAL effect and bottom pressure is weaker. Parameterization with a constant coefficient of 0.1 reduces errors due to failing to include SAL by about 30%. To do better than this, a proper scale-dependent representation of SAL must be used.

[1]  R. Ponte.  Variability in a homogeneous global ocean forced by barometric pressure , 1993 .

[2]  M. Hendershott,et al.  The Effects of Solid Earth Deformation on Global Ocean Tides , 1972 .

[3]  W. Farrell.  A Discussion on the measurement and interpretation of changes of strain in the Earth - Earth tides, ocean tides and tidal loading , 1973, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  P. Woodworth,et al.  Departures from the local inverse barometer model observed in altimeter and tide gauge data and in a global barotropic numerical model , 2001 .

[5]  D. Webb,et al.  A Multiprocessor Ocean General Circulation Model Using Message Passing , 1997 .

[6]  D. Webb,et al.  IMPROVED ADVECTION SCHEMES FOR OCEAN MODELS , 1998 .

[7]  Ichiro Fukumori,et al.  Nature of global large‐scale sea level variability in relation to atmospheric forcing: A modeling study , 1998 .

[8]  C. Pekeris,et al.  Solution of the tidal equations for the M2 and S2 tides in the world oceans from a knowledge of the tidal potential alone , 1978, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  D. Agnew,et al.  Self-consistent equilibrium ocean tides , 1978 .

[10]  D. Webb,et al.  An ocean resonance in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean , 2002 .

[11]  Yi Chao,et al.  A Comparison Between the TOPEX/POSEIDON Data and a Global Ocean General Circulation , 1995 .

[12]  R. Davidson,et al.  A note on the barotropic response of sea level to time‐dependent wind forcing , 1995 .

[13]  Olivier Francis,et al.  Global charts of ocean tide loading effects , 1990 .

[14]  D. Webb,et al.  The Development of a Free-Surface Bryan–Cox–Semtner Ocean Model , 1991 .

[15]  Gary D. Egbert,et al.  Deviation of Long-Period Tides from Equilibrium: Kinematics and Geostrophy , 2003 .

[16]  A. Arakawa,et al.  Numerical methods used in atmospheric models , 1976 .

[17]  R. Ray.  Ocean self‐attraction and loading in numerical tidal models , 1998 .

[18]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[19]  D. Webb,et al.  An Ocean Resonance in the Southeast Pacific , 2002 .

[20]  E. G. Banke,et al.  Variation of the sea surface drag coefficient with wind speed , 1975 .

[21]  T. Baker,et al.  Tidal gravity in Britain: tidal loading and the spatial distribution of the marine tide , 1980 .