Implementation and analysis of proxy MIPv6

Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) is a host-based mobility support specification which has been approved by the IETF as the standardized solution of global mobility management in IPv6 network for Mobile Node (MN). However, MIPv6 handover procedure results in a large handover delay. To improve its performance, some MIPv6 variants such as Fast Handover for MIPv6 (FMIPv6) and Hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) were proposed. However, they all require the MN to support the mobility management protocols which increase the difficulty of management and deployment. Recently, IETF NETLMM workgroup published the Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) which is a network-based localized mobility management to provide the mobility support for mobile host without the involvement of the mobility signaling. In this paper, we analyze the singling cost of PMIPv6 and implement it in our test-bed to evaluate its performance. The results show that the PMIPv6 has lower signaling cost and packet delivery cost, and it can improve the handover performance of UDP and TCP than the other mobility management protocols under low-delay networks, as for the wide area networks, it needs to introduce some mechanism like fast handover to further improve its performance. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Tai-Myoung Chung,et al.  A comparative signaling cost analysis of Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[2]  Youn-Hee Han,et al.  Care-of address provisioning for efficient IPv6 mobility support , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[3]  Yi-Bing Lin Reducing location update cost in a PCS network , 1997, TNET.

[4]  Hyo-Beom Lee,et al.  Empirical performance evaluation of IETF mobile IPv6 and proxy mobile IPv6 , 2008, Mobility '08.

[5]  Youn-Hee Han,et al.  Reactive Handover Optimization in IPv6-Based Mobile Networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Xiaoming Fu,et al.  Evaluating the Benefits of Introducing PMIPv6 for Localized Mobility Management , 2008, 2008 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference.

[7]  Hongke Zhang,et al.  Implementation and analysis of network-based mobility management protocol in WLAN environments , 2008, Mobility '08.

[8]  Mohammed Atiquzzaman,et al.  Handover latency comparison of SIGMA, FMIPv6, HMIPv6, FHMIPv6 , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[9]  Mark Carson,et al.  NIST Net: a Linux-based network emulation tool , 2003, CCRV.

[10]  Hongke Zhang,et al.  A Fast Handover Scheme of PMIPv6 and Performance Analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A new random walk model for PCS networks , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Myung-Ki Shin,et al.  Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6 , 2008, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[13]  Myung-Ki Shin,et al.  Handover Latency Analysis of a Network-Based Localized Mobility Management Protocol , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[14]  Ahmad Faris Ismail,et al.  Handoff latency analysis of mobile IPv6 protocol variations , 2007, Comput. Commun..