Autoencoder-driven Spiral Representation Learning for Gravitational Wave Surrogate Modelling

Recently, artificial neural networks have been gaining momentum in the field of gravitational wave astronomy, for example in surrogate modelling of computationally expensive waveform models for binary black hole inspiral and merger. Surrogate modelling yields fast and accurate approximations of gravitational waves and neural networks have been used in the final step of interpolating the coefficients of the surrogate model for arbitrary waveforms outside the training sample. We investigate the existence of underlying structures in the empirical interpolation coefficients using autoencoders. We demonstrate that when the coefficient space is compressed to only two dimensions, a spiral structure appears, wherein the spiral angle is linearly related to the mass ratio. Based on this finding, we design a spiral module with learnable parameters, that is used as the first layer in a neural network, which learns to map the input space to the coefficients. The spiral module is evaluated on multiple neural network architectures and consistently achieves better speed-accuracy trade-off than baseline models. A thorough experimental study is conducted and the final result is a surrogate model which can evaluate millions of input parameters in a single forward pass in under 1ms on a desktop GPU, while the mismatch between the corresponding generated waveforms and the ground-truth waveforms is better than the compared baseline methods. We anticipate the existence of analogous underlying structures and corresponding computational gains also in the case of spinning black hole binaries.

[1]  Frank Ohme,et al.  Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects , 2018, Physical Review D.

[2]  Lawrence E. Kidder,et al.  Multipolar effective-one-body waveforms for precessing binary black holes: Construction and validation , 2020, Physical Review D.

[3]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run , 2016, 1606.04856.

[4]  J. K. Blackburn,et al.  GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run , 2020, 2010.14527.

[5]  Thibault Damour,et al.  Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides, and self-spin effects , 2018, Physical Review D.

[6]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[7]  Jian Sun,et al.  Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[8]  Luca Antiga,et al.  Automatic differentiation in PyTorch , 2017 .

[9]  Daniel Williams,et al.  Precessing numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for binary black holes: A Gaussian process regression approach , 2019 .

[10]  N. Nguyen,et al.  A general multipurpose interpolation procedure: the magic points , 2008 .

[11]  Anastasios Tefas,et al.  Discriminatively Trained Autoencoders for Fast and Accurate Face Recognition , 2017, EANN.

[12]  Chunyan Miao,et al.  Online multimodal deep similarity learning with application to image retrieval , 2013, ACM Multimedia.

[13]  C. Broeck,et al.  Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects , 2018, Physical Review D.

[14]  Kai Staats,et al.  Enhancing gravitational-wave science with machine learning , 2020, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[16]  G. Pratten,et al.  Multipolar effective one body waveform model for spin-aligned black hole binaries , 2020, 2001.09082.

[17]  Chad R. Galley,et al.  Reduced-Order Modeling with Artificial Neurons for Gravitational-Wave Inference. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[18]  Anastasios Tefas,et al.  Self-supervised autoencoders for clustering and classification , 2018, Evolving Systems.

[19]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[20]  D. Keitel,et al.  Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes , 2020, Physical Review D.

[21]  Parameswaran Ajith,et al.  Accurate inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational waveforms for nonspinning black-hole binaries including the effect of subdominant modes , 2017, 1708.03501.

[22]  Scott E. Field,et al.  A Surrogate model of gravitational waveforms from numerical relativity simulations of precessing binary black hole mergers , 2017, 1701.00550.

[24]  Anastasios Tefas,et al.  Deep learning algorithms for discriminant autoencoding , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[25]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[26]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysis , 2015, ICML.

[28]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object , 2020, 2006.12611.

[29]  Scott E. Field,et al.  Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[30]  A. Samajdar,et al.  Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems , 2019, Physical Review D.

[31]  Michael Boyle,et al.  Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors , 2016, 1611.03703.

[32]  Frank Ohme,et al.  Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes , 2020 .

[33]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders , 2008, ICML '08.

[34]  N. Nguyen,et al.  An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations , 2004 .

[35]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  The science case for LIGO-India , 2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[36]  Miguel Á. Carreira-Perpiñán,et al.  Hashing with binary autoencoders , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[37]  Sebastian Khan,et al.  Gravitational-wave surrogate models powered by artificial neural networks , 2020 .

[38]  Yoshinta Setyawati,et al.  Regression methods in waveform modeling: a comparative study , 2019, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[39]  C. Mishra,et al.  Including mode mixing in a higher-multipole model for gravitational waveforms from nonspinning black-hole binaries , 2019, Physical Review D.

[40]  Michael Boyle,et al.  Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism , 2011, 1106.1021.

[41]  Andrea Taracchini,et al.  Enriching the symphony of gravitational waves from binary black holes by tuning higher harmonics , 2018, Physical Review D.

[42]  Eric Poisson,et al.  Gravitational Waves, Volume 1: Theory and Experiments , 2008 .

[43]  Scott E. Field,et al.  Surrogate model of hybridized numerical relativity binary black hole waveforms , 2018, Physical Review D.

[44]  Jan S. Hesthaven,et al.  Fast prediction and evaluation of gravitational waveforms using surrogate models , 2013, ArXiv.

[45]  G. Pratten,et al.  Multipolar effective one body model for nonspinning black hole binaries , 2019, Physical Review D.