Point-of-Care Autofluorescence Imaging for Real-Time Sampling and Treatment Guidance of Bioburden in Chronic Wounds: First-in-Human Results

Background Traditionally, chronic wound infection is diagnosed by visual inspection under white light and microbiological sampling, which are subjective and suboptimal, respectively, thereby delaying diagnosis and treatment. To address this, we developed a novel handheld, fluorescence imaging device (PRODIGI) that enables non-contact, real-time, high-resolution visualization and differentiation of key pathogenic bacteria through their endogenous autofluorescence, as well as connective tissues in wounds. Methods and Findings This was a two-part Phase I, single center, non-randomized trial of chronic wound patients (male and female, ≥18 years; UHN REB #09-0015-A for part 1; UHN REB #12-5003 for part 2; clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01378728 for part 1 and NCT01651845 for part 2). Part 1 (28 patients; 54% diabetic foot ulcers, 46% non-diabetic wounds) established the feasibility of autofluorescence imaging to accurately guide wound sampling, validated against blinded, gold standard swab-based microbiology. Part 2 (12 patients; 83.3% diabetic foot ulcers, 16.7% non-diabetic wounds) established the feasibility of autofluorescence imaging to guide wound treatment and quantitatively assess treatment response. We showed that PRODIGI can be used to guide and improve microbiological sampling and debridement of wounds in situ, enabling diagnosis, treatment guidance and response assessment in patients with chronic wounds. PRODIGI is safe, easy to use and integrates into the clinical workflow. Clinically significant bacterial burden can be detected in seconds, quantitatively tracked over days-to-months and their biodistribution mapped within the wound bed, periphery, and other remote areas. Conclusions PRODIGI represents a technological advancement in wound sampling and treatment guidance for clinical wound care at the point-of-care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01651845; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01378728

[1]  M. Lieber,et al.  Macro Implementing an Extension of McNemar ’ s Test for Clustered Data , 1998 .

[2]  Richard White,et al.  Defined and refined: criteria for identifying wound infection revisited. , 2004, British journal of community nursing.

[3]  G T Rodeheaver,et al.  Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[4]  R. Burrell,et al.  Infection and the chronic wound: a focus on silver. , 2005, Advances in skin & wound care.

[5]  Lizhen Xu,et al.  Autofluorescence imaging device for real-time detection and tracking of pathogenic bacteria in a mouse skin wound model: preclinical feasibility studies , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  R. White,et al.  Critical colonization--the concept under scrutiny. , 2006, Ostomy/wound management.

[7]  R. White,et al.  Criteria for identifying wound infection--revisited. , 2005, Ostomy/wound management.

[8]  W. Jeffcoate,et al.  Wound healing and treatments for people with diabetic foot ulcers , 2004, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[9]  A. J. Macpherson,et al.  Layers of mutualism with commensal bacteria protect us from intestinal inflammation , 2006, Gut.

[10]  M. Strazzabosco,et al.  Deep tissue biopsy vs. superficial swab culture monitoring in the microbiological assessment of limb‐threatening diabetic foot infection , 2001, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  N. Marcon,et al.  Autofluorescence characterisation of isolated whole crypts and primary cultured human epithelial cells from normal, hyperplastic, and adenomatous colonic mucosa , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[12]  Florence M. Stone,et al.  PORPHYRIN COMPOUNDS DERIVED FROM BACTERIA , 1932, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  David G Armstrong,et al.  2012 infectious diseases society of america clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. , 2013, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[14]  C. Attinger,et al.  Wound healing: an overview. , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  R. F. Morgan,et al.  Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds. , 2001, Ostomy/wound management.

[16]  G. Bergen,et al.  Infection versus colonization in the critical care unit. , 1998, Critical care clinics.

[17]  R. Pottier,et al.  5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) induced formation of different fluorescent porphyrins: a study of the biosynthesis of porphyrins by bacteria of the human digestive tract. , 2007, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[18]  Brian C Wilson,et al.  New optical technologies for earlier endoscopic diagnosis of premalignant gastrointestinal lesions , 2002, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[19]  Thomas Wild,et al.  How precise is the evaluation of chronic wounds by health care professionals? , 2007, International wound journal.

[20]  P. Murray Manual approaches to rapid microbiology results. , 1985, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[21]  A. Johnsson,et al.  Porphyrin photosensitization of bacteria. , 1985, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[22]  D. G. Armstrong,et al.  Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management , 2001, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[23]  R. Sibbald,et al.  High bacterial load in asymptomatic diabetic patients with neurotrophic ulcers retards wound healing after application of Dermagraft. , 2001, Ostomy/wound management.

[24]  R. Newcombe,et al.  A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[25]  D. Armstrong,et al.  The edge effect: how and why wounds grow in size and depth. , 1998, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[26]  C J Papasian,et al.  The Microbiology Laboratory's Role in Life‐Threatening Infections , 1997, Critical care nursing quarterly.

[27]  D. Thomas Pressure ulcer scale for healing, Derivation and varidation of the PUSH tool , 1997 .

[28]  J. Burke,et al.  Infection control - a problem for patient safety. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  E. Ayello,et al.  Increased Bacterial Burden and Infection: The Story of NERDS and STONES , 2006, Advances in skin & wound care.

[30]  D. Steed,et al.  Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[31]  N. Santamaria,et al.  The clinical efficacy of two semi‐quantitative wound‐swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds , 2011, International wound journal.

[32]  M. Collier The use of advanced biological and tissue-engineered wound products. , 2006, Nursing Standard.

[33]  Arturo Casadevall,et al.  Host-Pathogen Interactions: Basic Concepts of Microbial Commensalism, Colonization, Infection, and Disease , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[34]  Z. Moore,et al.  Effective wound management: identifying criteria for infection. , 2007, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[35]  J. Montgomerie,et al.  Quantitative microbiology of pressure sores in different stages of healing. , 1986, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[36]  T. Macleod,et al.  Wound swabbing technique. , 2003, Nursing times.

[37]  D. Wang,et al.  Image and Texture Segmentation Using Local Spectral Histograms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Zvi Malik,et al.  ALA induced photodynamic effects on Gram positive and negative bacteria , 2004, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[39]  B. Cunha Fever of unknown origin: focused diagnostic approach based on clinical clues from the history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. , 2007, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[40]  C. D. Cox,et al.  Siderophore activity of pyoverdin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1985, Infection and immunity.

[41]  D. Thomas,et al.  Wound healing , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[42]  P. Clegg,et al.  The role of endogenous and exogenous enzymes in chronic wounds: A focus on the implications of aberrant levels of both host and bacterial proteases in wound healing , 2012, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[43]  B. Doebbeling,et al.  The validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection , 2001, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[44]  R. Frantz,et al.  A tool to assess clinical signs and symptoms of localized infection in chronic wounds: development and reliability. , 2001, Ostomy/wound management.

[45]  Madeleine Flanagan,et al.  Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice. , 2003, Ostomy/wound management.

[46]  M. Ågren,et al.  The Extracellular Matrix in Wound Healing: A Closer Look at Therapeutics for Chronic Wounds , 2007, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[47]  K. Moore Cell biology of chronic wounds: the role of inflammation. , 1999, Journal of wound care.

[48]  V. Nube,et al.  Increased Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Predicts Poor Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Ulcers , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[49]  K. Harding,et al.  Clinical review Science , medicine , and the future Healing chronic wounds , 2005 .

[50]  Jean-Marie Meyer,et al.  Pyoverdines: pigments, siderophores and potential taxonomic markers of fluorescent Pseudomonas species , 2000, Archives of Microbiology.

[51]  G. Dow,et al.  Infection in chronic wounds: controversies in diagnosis and treatment. , 1999, Ostomy/wound management.

[52]  J. Zenilman,et al.  Molecular microbiology: new dimensions for cutaneous biology and wound healing. , 2010, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[53]  P. Bowler Wound pathophysiology, infection and therapeutic options , 2002, Annals of medicine.

[54]  M Doss,et al.  Comparison of porphyrin and heme biosynthesis in various heterotrophic bacteria. , 1973, Enzyme.

[55]  David G. Armstrong,et al.  Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infectionsa , 2012 .

[56]  K. Harding,et al.  Bacteria and wound healing , 2004, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[57]  R. H. Browne On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[58]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data. , 1997 .

[59]  Benjamin A Lipsky,et al.  How reliable are cultures of specimens from superficial swabs compared with those of deep tissue in patients with diabetic foot ulcers? , 2012, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[60]  B. Bates-Jensen,et al.  The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[61]  K. Harding,et al.  Wound healing , 2002 .

[62]  D. Gross,et al.  Characterization of Pyoverdinpss, the Fluorescent Siderophore Produced by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae , 1987 .

[63]  Kath Bogie,et al.  Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[64]  B. Bates-Jensen,et al.  Wound Care: A Collaborative Practice Manual for Health Professionals , 2006 .

[65]  Brian C Wilson,et al.  Molecular Fluorescence Excitation–Emission Matrices Relevant to Tissue Spectroscopy¶ , 2003, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[66]  I. K. Cohen,et al.  Biology of wound healing. , 1984, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[67]  L. Nanney,et al.  Cell biology of wound healing. , 1996, International review of cytology.