Fostering justice through engagement: A literature review of public engagement in energy transitions

[1]  J. Palm,et al.  The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[2]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration , 2021 .

[3]  R. Heffron,et al.  Conceptualising restorative justice in the energy Transition: Changing the perspectives of fossil fuels , 2021 .

[4]  B. Ó Gallachóir,et al.  Participatory network mapping of an emergent social network for a regional transition to a low-carbon and just society on the Dingle Peninsula , 2021, Local Environment.

[5]  D. Horst,et al.  Grounding the energy justice lifecycle framework: An exploration of utility-scale wind power in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2021 .

[6]  Philipp A. Trotter,et al.  Towards people-private-public partnerships: An integrated community engagement model for capturing energy access needs , 2021 .

[7]  Warathida Chaiyapa,et al.  From end-users to policy designers: Breaking open the black box of energy technocracy in Thailand , 2021 .

[8]  Carelle Mang-Benza.  Many shades of pink in the energy transition: Seeing women in energy extraction, production, distribution, and consumption , 2021 .

[9]  R. Mourik,et al.  The same old story – or not? How storytelling can support inclusive local energy policy , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[10]  Alevgul H. Sorman,et al.  From consultation toward co-production in science and policy: A critical systematic review of participatory climate and energy initiatives , 2021 .

[11]  Douglas L. Bessette,et al.  Understanding Socio-Technological Systems Change through an Indigenous Community-Based Participatory Framework , 2021, Sustainability.

[12]  S. Cinderby,et al.  Transforming urban planning processes and outcomes through creative methods , 2021, Ambio.

[13]  B. V. Vliet,et al.  Co-production in the wind energy sector: A systematic literature review of public engagement beyond invited stakeholder participation , 2021 .

[14]  D. Roux,et al.  The role of environmental managers in knowledge co-production: Insights from two case studies , 2021 .

[15]  Alexander K. Saeri,et al.  Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes , 2021 .

[16]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  How public values theory can influence energy infrastructure planning: Exploring values articulation, time horizons, and substitutability through the Atlantic Coast pipeline , 2021 .

[17]  V. Lam,et al.  Evaluating deliberative participation from a social learning perspective: A case study of the 2012 National Energy Deliberative Polling inpost‐FukushimaJapan , 2021 .

[18]  A. Brent,et al.  Reviewing the impacts of community energy initiatives in New Zealand , 2021 .

[19]  M. Bell.  Spatialising procedural justice: fairness and local knowledge mobilisation in nuclear waste siting , 2021 .

[20]  Taedong Lee,et al.  Credible Empowerment and Deliberative Participation: A Comparative Study of Two Nuclear Energy Policy Deliberation Cases in Korea , 2020, Review of Policy Research.

[21]  María Mercedes Vanegas Cantarero.  Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: A roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries , 2020 .

[22]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Sociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[23]  Esther Marín-González,et al.  People in transitions: Energy citizenship, prosumerism and social movements in Europe , 2020 .

[24]  Karen E. Makuch,et al.  The UK net-zero target: Insights into procedural justice for greenhouse gas removal , 2020 .

[25]  P. Biegelbauer,et al.  How (not) to solve local conflicts around alternative energy production: Six cases of siting decisions of Austrian wind power parks , 2020 .

[26]  Evelien de Hoop.  More Democratic Sustainability Governance through Participatory Knowledge Production? A Framework and Systematic Analysis , 2020, Sustainability.

[27]  E. Dias,et al.  Urban energy transition in a gaming context: The role of children , 2020 .

[28]  Christopher Ansell,et al.  Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach , 2020 .

[29]  S. Juhola,et al.  Participatory experimentation on a climate street , 2020, Environmental Policy and Governance.

[30]  F. Geels,et al.  Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[31]  A. Froese,et al.  Failure through Success: Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development , 2020, Science, Technology, & Human Values.

[32]  Cristián Flores-Fernández.  The Chilean energy “transition”: between successful policy and the assimilation of a post-political energy condition , 2020 .

[33]  Victoria Pellicer-Sifres.  Transformative Energy Transition from the bottom-up: exploring the contribution of grassroots innovations in the Spanish context , 2020 .

[34]  Laurence L. Delina.  A rural energy collaboratory: co-production in Thailand’s community energy experiments , 2019, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[35]  A. Lis,et al.  Co-producing European knowledge and publics amidst controversy: The EU expert network on unconventional hydrocarbons , 2019, Science and Public Policy.

[36]  Christina Demski,et al.  Of profits, transparency, and responsibility: Public views on financing energy system change in Great Britain , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[37]  L. Steg,et al.  In it for the money, the environment, or the community? Motives for being involved in community energy initiatives , 2019, Global Environmental Change.

[38]  Stephen Williams,et al.  Justice in energy transitions , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[39]  Katharina Gugerell,et al.  Mapping Game Mechanics for Learning in a Serious Game for the Energy Transition , 2019, International Journal of E-Planning Research.

[40]  C. Alvial-Palavicino,et al.  Looking back to go forward? The interplay between long-term futures and political expectations in sustainability transitions in Chile , 2018, Futures.

[41]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: New empirical and conceptual insights , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[42]  Johannes Schmidt,et al.  A participatory integrated assessment of the social acceptance of wind energy , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[43]  J. B. Eisen,et al.  Clean Energy Justice: Charting an Emerging Agenda , 2018 .

[44]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Urgency in energy justice: Contestation and time in prospective shale extraction in the United States and United Kingdom , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[45]  Laurence L. Delina.  Energy democracy in a continuum: Remaking public engagement on energy transitions in Thailand , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[46]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[47]  N. Dunphy,et al.  Participative environmental policy integration in the Irish energy sector , 2018 .

[48]  M. Kroesen,et al.  Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems , 2018 .

[49]  S. Connelly,et al.  Community energies: Exploring the socio-political spatiality of energy transitions through the Clean Energy for Eternity campaign in New South Wales Australia , 2018 .

[50]  B. V. Veelen.  Negotiating energy democracy in practice : governance processes in community energy projects , 2018 .

[51]  Kacper Szulecki.  Conceptualizing energy democracy , 2018 .

[52]  S. Jasanoff.  Just transitions: A humble approach to global energy futures , 2017 .

[53]  Michael Ruddat,et al.  Local and socio-political acceptance of wind farms in Germany , 2017 .

[54]  Michèle Knodt,et al.  Challenges of Citizen Participation in Infrastructure Policy‐Making in Multi‐Level Systems—The Case of Onshore Wind Energy Expansion in Germany , 2017 .

[55]  C. Howarth.  Informing decision making on climate change and low carbon futures: Framing narratives around the United Kingdom’s fifth carbon budget , 2017 .

[56]  S. Fast.  Assessing public participation tools during wind energy siting , 2017, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[57]  Hana Kim,et al.  A Community Energy Transition Model for Urban Areas: The Energy Self-Reliant Village Program in Seoul, South Korea , 2017 .

[58]  Chad Walker,et al.  Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes , 2017 .

[59]  Per Gustafson,et al.  Understanding Participatory Governance: An Analysis of Participants’ Motives for Participation , 2017 .

[60]  Matthew J. Burke,et al.  New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice , 2017 .

[61]  Matthew Cotton,et al.  Shale gas governance in the United Kingdom and the United States: Opportunities for public participation and the implications for social justice , 2017 .

[62]  Karen Lucas,et al.  Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences , 2016 .

[63]  Rosie Day,et al.  Distributional justice in solar energy implementation in India: The case of Charanka solar park , 2016 .

[64]  G. Marsden,et al.  Mobility justice in low carbon energy transitions , 2016 .

[65]  H. Wallbaum,et al.  Socio-economic impact of renovation and energy retrofitting of the Gothenburg building stock , 2016 .

[66]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? , 2015 .

[67]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Energy Justice: Conceptual Insights and Practical Applications , 2015 .

[68]  V. Bekkers,et al.  A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey , 2014 .

[69]  Dustin Mulvaney,et al.  The political economy of the ‘just transition’ , 2013 .

[70]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Metering: EU policy and implications for fuel poor households , 2012 .

[71]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions , 2012 .

[72]  F. Wickson,et al.  Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology , 2011 .

[73]  Eddie Oldfield,et al.  Addressing Energy Poverty Through Smarter Technology , 2011 .

[74]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[75]  Poonam Pandey,et al.  Knowledge politics, vulnerability and recognition-based justice: Public participation in renewable energy transitions in India , 2021 .

[76]  Gillan Chi-Lun Huang,et al.  Injustices in phasing out nuclear power?: Exploring limited public participation and transparency in Taiwan’s transition away from nuclear energy , 2021 .

[77]  D. Evensen,et al.  ‘Mind the gap: Accounting for equitable participation and energy democracy in Kenya’ , 2021 .

[78]  Carrie L. Mitchell,et al.  Inclusive resilience: Examining a case study of equity-centred strategic planning in Toronto, Canada , 2021 .

[79]  Stanislav Martinát,et al.  What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[80]  Maja Horst,et al.  Identities, innovation, and governance: A systematic review of co-creation in wind energy transitions , 2021 .

[81]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems: Exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research , 2019, Applied Energy.

[82]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Stakeholder empowerment through participatory planning practices: The case of electricity transmission lines in France and Norway , 2017 .

[83]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Energy justice : a conceptual review , 2016 .