Ailing Voters Advance Attractive Congressional Candidates

Among many benefits of facial attractiveness, there is evidence that more attractive politicians are more likely to be elected. Recent research found this effect to be most pronounced in congressional districts with high disease threat—a result attributed to an adaptive disease avoidance mechanism, whereby the association of low attractiveness with poor health is particularly worrisome to voters who feel vulnerable to disease. We provided a more direct test of this explanation by examining the effects of individuals' own health and age. Supporting a disease avoidance mechanism, less healthy participants showed a stronger preference for more attractive contenders in U.S. Senate races than their healthier peers, and this effect was stronger for older participants, who were generally less healthy than younger participants. Stronger effects of health for older participants partly reflected the absence of positive bias toward attractive candidates among the healthiest, suggesting that healthy older adults may be unconcerned about disease threat or sufficiently wise to ignore attractiveness.

[1]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Older and younger adults' accuracy in discerning health and competence in older and younger faces. , 2014, Psychology and aging.

[2]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues. , 2014, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[3]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  The Attractiveness Halo Effect and the Babyface Stereotype in Older and Younger Adults: Similarities, Own-Age Accentuation, and Older Adult Positivity Effects , 2014, Experimental aging research.

[4]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity. , 2013, Psychology and aging.

[5]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane’ People in the Bolivian Rainforest , 2012 .

[6]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[7]  M. Schaller,et al.  The Behavioral Immune System (and Why It Matters) , 2011 .

[8]  M. Lachman,et al.  Promoting Functional Health in Midlife and Old Age: Long-Term Protective Effects of Control Beliefs, Social Support, and Physical Exercise , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  A. Lueschow,et al.  Dissociation of facial attractiveness and distinctiveness processing in congenital prosopagnosia , 2010 .

[10]  B. Verhulst,et al.  The Attractiveness Halo: Why Some Candidates are Perceived More Favorably than Others , 2010 .

[11]  C. Cooper,et al.  The SF-36: A simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies , 2009, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change. , 2006 .

[13]  J. Langlois,et al.  Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad? , 2006, Social cognition.

[14]  A. Todorov,et al.  Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.

[15]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Deliver us from Evil: The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[16]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health , 2004 .

[17]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[18]  Jason Faulkner,et al.  Evolved Disease-Avoidance Processes and Contemporary Anti-Social Behavior: Prejudicial Attitudes and Avoidance of People with Physical Disabilities , 2003 .

[19]  D. Perrett,et al.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and their Origins , 2002 .

[21]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives , 2001 .

[22]  Alan Slater,et al.  The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: current perspectives , 2001 .

[23]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[24]  D. Perrett,et al.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[27]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[29]  A. Feingold Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[30]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[31]  S. Folstein,et al.  “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician , 1975 .

[32]  F. edridge-green Test for Colour Blindness , 1895 .

[33]  George W. Bush Deliver us from Evil : The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9 / 11 on Support for President , 2014 .

[34]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Facial appearance affects voting decisions. , 2007 .

[35]  Jeffrey P. Toth,et al.  The Aging of Executive Functions. , 2006 .

[36]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. , 2002 .

[37]  K. Dion Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness. , 2002 .

[38]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[39]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[40]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .

[41]  R. Cattell,et al.  Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[42]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Human Threat Management Systems: Self-protection and Disease Avoidance , 2022 .

[43]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Polling the Face: Prediction and Consensus across Cultures , 2022 .