Axiomatic bargaining theory on economic environments

Abstract Axiomatic bargaining theory is reexamined by focusing upon the economic exhange environment instead of the traditional utility possibility set. It is argued that the axioms of the traditional theory impose stronger restrictions than can be supported by their motivating economic intuitions. Weaker alternative axioms, making explicit use of economic information, are used to characterize the standard bargaining solutions. A key idea is to impose consistency of the solution with respect to changes in the dimension of the commodity space. Even these weaker economic axioms, however, may be unrealistic restrictions to impose on the bargaining solution in the context of many economic bargaining problems.

[1]  Al Roth,et al.  Toward a Theory of Bargaining: An Experimental Study in Economics , 1983, Science.

[2]  Terje Lensberg,et al.  Stability and Collective Rationality , 1987 .

[3]  J. Roemer Equality of Resources Implies Equality of Welfare , 1986 .

[4]  R. Howe Sections and extensions of concave functions , 1987 .

[5]  A Challenge to Neo-Lockeanism , 1988, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[6]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study , 1982 .

[7]  W. Thomson Problems of fair division and the Egalitarian solution , 1983 .

[8]  A. Sen,et al.  Utilitarianism and Welfarism , 1979 .

[9]  George J. Stigler,et al.  De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum , 2010 .

[10]  R. Bixby,et al.  A characterization of Pareto surfaces , 1973 .

[11]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[12]  E. Kalai,et al.  OTHER SOLUTIONS TO NASH'S BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1975 .

[13]  Egalitarianism, Responsibility, and Information , 1987, Economics and Philosophy.

[14]  Norman Schofield,et al.  Generalized Symmetry Conditions at a Core Point , 1987 .

[15]  J. Roemer The Mismarriage of Bargaining Theory and Distributive Justice , 1986, Ethics.

[16]  J. Harsanyi Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955 .

[17]  M. Yaari,et al.  On dividing justly , 1984 .

[18]  John E. Roemer,et al.  Equality of Talent , 1985, Economics and Philosophy.

[19]  Serge-Christophe Kolm,et al.  Justice et équité , 1972 .

[20]  E. Kalai Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons , 1977 .

[21]  E. Kalai,et al.  Monotonic Solutions to General Cooperative Games , 1985 .