E-Government, Democratic Governance and Integrative Prospects for Developing Countries: The Case for a Globally Federated Architecture

The objectives of this chapter are threefold: first, to provide a conceptual framework for understanding e-government as a set of four interrelated dimensions of public sector change; second, to consider the relevance and applicability of this framework for both developed and developing nations; and third, to explore the interface between domestic and transnational governance reforms in an increasingly digital era. The world in the twenty-first century needs a globally federated governance architecture, the design of which must include social, economic, political, and technological considerations. This strengthened focus on transnational governance systems must also be joined by the recognition of the dysfunctional nature of the present system of bilateral international assistance programs among countries. With improved governance conditions of transparency and trust transnationally — facilitated in part by a much more politically creative and aggressive use of new technologies, the resources allocated by each country across their various recipients would serve both developing nations and the world as a whole if they were pooled and coordinated through new transnational mechanisms.

[1]  Mark B. Salter,et al.  Passports, Mobility, and Security: How smart can the border be? , 2004 .

[2]  Pippa Norris,et al.  The Impact of the Internet on Political Activism: Evidence from Europe , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[3]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Strategic Use of Information Technology for Global Organizations , 2007 .

[4]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Deploying Homeland Security Technology , 2003 .

[5]  Jairo A. Gutiérrez,et al.  An Investigation of Revenue Streams of New Zealand Online Content Providers , 2004, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[6]  Journal of Global Information Management , 2022 .

[7]  Audrey N. Selian,et al.  The World Summit on the Information Society and Civil Society Participation , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Roger W. Harris,et al.  Anxiety and involvement: cultural dimensions of attitudes toward computers in developing societies , 1999 .

[9]  Zlatko J. Kovacic,et al.  A Brave New E-World? An Exploratory Analysis of Worldwide E-Government Readiness, Level of Democracy, Corruption and Globalization , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[10]  Daniel W. Drezner The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the State Back In , 2004 .

[11]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Electronic Democracy at the American Grassroots , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[12]  Valentina Ndou,et al.  E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[13]  Hakikur Rahman,et al.  Selected Readings on Global Information Technology: Contemporary Applications , 2008 .

[14]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  A New Agenda for e-Democracy , 2005 .

[15]  G. Paquet,et al.  E-Governance and Smart Communities , 2001 .

[16]  Subhajit Basu,et al.  E‐government and developing countries: an overview , 2004 .

[17]  Richard Heeks,et al.  eGovernment in Africa: Promise and Practice , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[18]  Deborah Waller Meyers,et al.  Does “Smarter” Lead to Safer? An Assessment of the US Border Accords with Canada and Mexico , 2003 .

[19]  Antony Bryant,et al.  Trust in Electronic Commerce Business Relationships , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[20]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECURITY IMPERATIVE: IMPORTANT ISSUES AND DRIVERS , 2002 .

[21]  Tzu-Chuan Chou,et al.  Managing industry enabled e-government: lessons learned from the IT industry in Taiwan , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[22]  Harald Mahrer,et al.  Politicians as Patrons for E-Democracy? Closing the Gap Between Ideals and Realities , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..