Reliability and validity of cervical position measurements in individuals with and without chronic neck pain

Abstract Objectives: The cervical range of motion device (CROM) has been shown to provide reliable forward head position (FHP) measurement when the upper cervical angle (UCA) is controlled. However, measurement without UCA standardization is reflective of habitual patterns. Criterion validity has not been reported. The purposes of this study were to establish: (1) criterion validity of CROM FHP and UCA compared to Optotrak data, (2) relative reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95) in patients with and without cervical pain, and (3) to compare UCA and FHP in patients with and without pain in habitual postures. Methods: (1) Within-subjects single session concurrent criterion validity design. Simultaneous CROM and OP measurement was conducted in habitual sitting posture in 16 healthy young adults. (2) Reliability and MDC95 of UCA and FHP were calculated from three trials. (3) Values for adults over 35 years with cervical pain and age-matched healthy controls were compared. Results: (1) Forward head position distances were moderately correlated and UCA angles were highly correlated. The mean (standard deviation) differences can be expected to vary between 1·48 cm (1·74) for FHP and −1·7 (2·46)° for UCA. (2) Reliability for CROM FHP measurements were good to excellent (no pain) and moderate (pain). Cervical range of motion FHP MDC95 was moderately low (no pain), and moderate (pain). Reliability for CROM UCA measurements was excellent and MDC95 low for both groups. There was no difference in FHP distances between the pain and no pain groups, UCA was significantly more extended in the pain group (P<0·05). Discussion: Cervical range of motion FHP measurements were only moderately correlated with Optotrak data, and limits of agreement (LOA) and MDC95 were relatively large. There was also no difference in CROM FHP distance between older symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Cervical range of motion FHP measurement is therefore not recommended as a clinical outcome measure. Cervical range of motion UCA measurements showed good criterion validity, excellent test–retest reliability, and achievable MDC95 in asymptomatic and symptomatic participants. Differences of more than 6° are required to exceed error. Cervical range of motion UCA shows promise as a useful reliable and valid measurement, particularly as patients with cervical pain exhibited significantly more extended angles.

[1]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[4]  Rossi Am,et al.  Video display terminal use and reported health symptoms among Massachusetts clerical workers , 1987 .

[5]  L. Pagnotto,et al.  Video display terminal use and reported health symptoms among Massachusetts clerical workers. , 1987, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[6]  Y. Shiau,et al.  Body posture and hand strength of patients with temporomandibular disorder. , 1990, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[7]  M. Epler,et al.  Clinical assessment procedures in physical therapy , 1990 .

[8]  K. Ottenbacher,et al.  THE ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES IN REHABILITATION RESEARCH , 1993, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[9]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Reliability of measuring forward head posture in a clinical setting. , 1993, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[10]  K. Roach,et al.  Relationship of Forward Head Posture and Cervical Backward Bending to Neck Pain , 1995 .

[11]  A. Harrison,et al.  Clinical measurement of head and shoulder posture variables. , 1996, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  M. Tousignant,et al.  Criterion Validity of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer for Cervical Flexion and Extension , 2000, Spine.

[13]  S. Mercer,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  M. Rondeau,et al.  Reliability of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Device and Plumb-Line Techniques in Measuring Resting Head Posture (RHP) , 2000 .

[15]  L. Straker,et al.  A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  N. Ashworth,et al.  Reliability of the Visual Assessment of Cervical and Lumbar Lordosis: How Good Are We? , 2003, Spine.

[17]  E. Keshner.  Head-trunk coordination during linear anterior-posterior translations. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  E. Keshner.  Head-trunk coordination in elderly subjects during linear anterior-posterior translations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  K. Zabjek,et al.  Evaluation of segmental postural characteristics during quiet standing in control and Idiopathic Scoliosis patients. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  L. Straker,et al.  A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work--2: neck and shoulder kinematics. , 2005, Manual therapy.

[21]  R A States,et al.  Precision and repeatability of the Optotrak 3020 motion measurement system , 2006, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[22]  D. Magee,et al.  A comparison of the head and cervical posture between the self-balanced position and the Frankfurt method. , 2006, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[23]  H. Corriveau,et al.  Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. , 2006, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[24]  F. Su,et al.  The feasibility of a video-based motion analysis system in measuring the segmental movements between upper and lower cervical spine. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[25]  S. O'Leary,et al.  Recruitment of the deep cervical flexor muscles during a postural-correction exercise performed in sitting. , 2007, Manual therapy.

[26]  B. Vicenzino,et al.  Effect of Neck Exercise on Sitting Posture in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[27]  K. Grimmer-Somers,et al.  Measurement of cervical posture in the sagittal plane. , 2008, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[28]  C. Yip,et al.  The relationship between head posture and severity and disability of patients with neck pain. , 2008, Manual therapy.

[29]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Photographic measurement of upper-body sitting posture of high school students: A reliability and validity study , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[30]  W. Bandy,et al.  Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. , 2008, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[31]  Elizabeth A. Tully,et al.  Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults. , 2009, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[32]  S. Edmondston,et al.  Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain. , 2009, Manual therapy.

[33]  Mark I. Johnson,et al.  Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin: a comparison between patients and pain-free persons. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  Mark I. Johnson,et al.  Reliability and validity of head posture assessment by observation and a four-category scale. , 2010, Manual therapy.

[35]  J. Côté,et al.  Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. , 2010, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[36]  P. O'Sullivan,et al.  The influence of different sitting postures on head/neck posture and muscle activity. , 2010, Manual therapy.

[37]  S. O'Leary,et al.  Craniocervical orientation affects muscle activation when exercising the cervical extensors in healthy subjects. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  T. Chiu,et al.  Relationships between sagittal postures of thoracic and cervical spine, presence of neck pain, neck pain severity and disability. , 2010, Manual therapy.

[39]  S. O'Leary,et al.  Pain-induced Changes in the Activity of the Cervical Extensor Muscles Evaluated by Muscle Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, The Clinical journal of pain.

[40]  F. Cheriet,et al.  Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[41]  G. Allison,et al.  Changes in mechanical load and extensor muscle activity in the cervico-thoracic spine induced by sitting posture modification , 2011, Ergonomics.

[42]  B. Martin,et al.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  D. Farina,et al.  The Change in Deep Cervical Flexor Activity After Training Is Associated With the Degree of Pain Reduction in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain , 2012, The Clinical journal of pain.

[44]  K. Dunleavy,et al.  Comparison of cervical range of motion in two seated postural conditions in adults 50 or older with cervical pain , 2013, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[45]  Leslie G. Portney Dpt PhD Fapta,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .