Analyzing and Modeling of Medical Data on Distributed Computing Infrastructures

Researchers want to analyse Health Care data which may requires large pools of compute and data resources. To have them they need access to Distributed Computing Infrastructures (DCI). To use them it requires expertise which researchers may not have. Workflows can hide infrastructures. There are many workflow systems but they are not interoperable. To learn a workflow system and create workflows in a workflow system may require significant effort. Considering these efforts it is not reasonable to expect that researchers will learn new workflow systems if they want to run workflows of other workflow systems. As a result, the lack of interoperability prevents workflow sharing and a vast amount of research efforts is wasted. The FP7 Sharing Interoperable Workflow for Large-Scale Scientific Simulation on Available DCIs (SHIWA) project developed the Coarse-Grained Interoperability (CGI) to enable workflow sharing. The project created the SHIWA Simulation Platform (SSP) to support CGI as a production-level service. The paper describes how the CGI approach can be used for analysis and simulation in Health Care.

[1]  Michael Boniface,et al.  Workflow Interoperability in Grid-based Systems , 2006 .

[2]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system , 2006, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[3]  Gábor Terstyánszky,et al.  GEMLCA: Running Legacy Code Applications as Grid Services , 2005, Journal of Grid Computing.

[4]  Johan Montagnat,et al.  Flexible and Efficient Workflow Deployment of Data-Intensive Applications On Grids With MOTEUR , 2008, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[5]  Daniel S. Katz,et al.  Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems , 2005, Sci. Program..

[6]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  P-GRADE Portal: A generic workflow system to support user communities , 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[7]  A. Nekrutenko,et al.  Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences , 2010, Genome Biology.

[8]  Antonio Brogi,et al.  From BPEL Processes to YAWL Workflows , 2006, WS-FM.

[9]  Jun Qin,et al.  ASKALON: A Development and Grid Computing Environment for Scientific Workflows , 2007, Workflows for e-Science, Scientific Workflows for Grids.

[10]  B. Odgers,et al.  Distributed Workflow Co-ordination by Proactive Software Agents , 1999 .

[11]  Cees T. A. M. de Laat,et al.  VLE-WFBus: A Scientific Workflow Bus for Multi e-Science Domains , 2006, 2006 Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science'06).

[12]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Ian J. Taylor,et al.  The Triana Workflow Environment: Architecture and Applications , 2007, Workflows for e-Science, Scientific Workflows for Grids.