Implementation of the MEPDG for New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures for Design of Concrete and Asphalt Pavements in Minnesota

The recently introduced Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and related software provide capabilities for the analysis and performance prediction of different types of flexible and rigid pavements. An important aspect of this process is the evaluation of the performance prediction models and sensitivity of the predicted distresses to various input parameters for local conditions and, if necessary, re-calibration of the performance prediction models. To achieve these objectives, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the Local Road Research Board (LRRB) initiated a study “Implementation of the MEPDG for New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures for Design of Concrete and Asphalt Pavements in Minnesota.” This report presents the results of the evaluation of default inputs, identification of deficiencies in the software, sensitivity analysis, and comparison of results to the expected limits for typical Minnesota site conditions, a wide range of pavement design features (e.g. layer thickness, material properties, etc), and the effects of different parameters on predicted pavement distresses. Since the sensitivity analysis was conducted over a span of several years and the MEPDG software underwent significant modifications, especially for flexible pavements, various versions of the MEPDG software were run. Performance prediction models of the latest version of the MEPDG 1.003 were evaluated and modified or recalibrated to reduce bias and error in performance prediction for Minnesota conditions.

[1]  Shreenath Rao,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND CALIBRATION OF A MECHANISTIC DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR JOINTED PLAIN CONCRETE PAVEMENTS , 2001 .

[2]  Matthew W Witczak,et al.  Equivalent Granular Base Moduli: Prediction , 1981 .

[3]  R. Roque,et al.  Thermal cracking performance and design of mixtures using Superpave , 1995 .

[4]  Mohamed M El-Basyouny,et al.  Part 2: Flexible Pavements: Calibration of Alligator Fatigue Cracking Model for 2002 Design Guide , 2005 .

[5]  Timothy C. Krehbiel,et al.  Correlation Coefficient Rule of Thumb , 2004 .

[6]  Final Document,et al.  Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design OF NEW AND REHABILITATED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES FINAL DOCUMENT APPENDIX QQ : STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MODELS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS NCHRP , 2004 .

[7]  M W Witczak,et al.  Verification of the Calibrated Fatigue Cracking Models for the 2002 Design Guide (With Discussion) , 2005 .

[8]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation approach of flexible MEPDG for Minnesota conditions , 2007 .

[9]  Barry J. Dempsey,et al.  Enhanced Integrated Climatic Model Version 2.0 , 1997 .

[10]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Mechanistic-Empirical Model to Predict Transverse Joint Faulting , 2004 .

[11]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Development of a Mechanistic-Empirical Structural Design Procedure for Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements , 2004 .

[12]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODELS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT BINDERS AND PAVING MIXES , 1993 .