SO2-Driven In Situ Formation of Superstable Hg3Se2Cl2 for Effective Flue Gas Mercury Removal.

Flue gas mercury removal is mandatory for decreasing global mercury background concentration and ecosystem protection, but it severely suffers from the instability of traditional demercury products (e.g., HgCl2, HgO, HgS, and HgSe). Herein, we demonstrate a superstable Hg3Se2Cl2 compound, which offers a promising next-generation flue gas mercury removal strategy. Theoretical calculations revealed a superstable Hg bonding structure in Hg3Se2Cl2, with the highest mercury dissociation energy (4.71 eV) among all known mercury compounds. Experiments demonstrate its unprecedentedly high thermal stability (>400 °C) and strong acid resistance (5% H2SO4). The Hg3Se2Cl2 compound could be produced via the reduction of SeO32- to nascent active Se0 by the flue gas component SO2 and the subsequent combination of Se0 with Hg0 and Cl- ions or HgCl2. During a laboratory-simulated experiment, this Hg3Se2Cl2-based strategy achieves >96% removal efficiencies of both Hg0 and HgCl2 enabling nearly zero Hg0 re-emission. As expected, real mercury removal efficiency under Se-rich industrial flue gas conditions is much more efficient than Se-poor counterparts, confirming the feasibility of this Hg3Se2Cl2-based strategy for practical applications. This study sheds light on the importance of stable demercury products in flue gas mercury treatment and also provides a highly efficient and safe flue gas demercury strategy.

[1]  G. Olivo,et al.  LA-ICP-MS Trace Element Composition of Sphalerite and Galena of the Proterozoic Carbonate-Hosted Morro Agudo Zn-Pb Sulfide District, Brazil: Insights into Ore Genesis , 2022, Minerals.

[2]  P. Mayer,et al.  Impact of coordination ability of the selected anions on tuning the structure of Hg(II) complexes constructed from a neutral dithione ligand: iodine uptake and DFT theoretical studies , 2022, Inorganica Chimica Acta.

[3]  H. Svensen,et al.  Mercury evidence for combustion of organic-rich sediments during the end-Triassic crisis , 2022, Nature Communications.

[4]  Yuzheng Guo,et al.  Reduced Fermi Level Pinning at Physisorptive Sites of Moire-MoS2/Metal Schottky Barriers , 2022, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  N. Yan,et al.  Regulation of the Sulfur Environment in Clusters to Construct a Mn-Sn2S6 Framework for Mercury Bonding. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Gideon A. Erkenswick,et al.  Amazon forests capture high levels of atmospheric mercury pollution from artisanal gold mining , 2022, Nature communications.

[7]  N. Yan,et al.  Heterogeneous Reaction Mechanisms and Functional Materials for Elemental Mercury Removal from Industrial Flue Gas , 2021, ACS ES&T Engineering.

[8]  Hailong Li,et al.  Surface-Engineered Sponge Decorated with Copper Selenide for Highly Efficient Gas-Phase Mercury Immobilization. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  W. Pan,et al.  A review on adsorbent/catalyst application for mercury removal in flue gas: Effect of sulphur oxides (SO2, SO3) , 2020 .

[10]  Q. Fan,et al.  Exploring sorption behaviors of Se(IV) and Se(VI) on Beishan granite: Batch, ATR-FTIR, and XPS investigations , 2020 .

[11]  Daniel C W Tsang,et al.  Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability , 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[12]  Wei Liu,et al.  Highly Active and Stable Metal Single-Atom Catalysts Achieved by Strong Electronic Metal-Support Interactions. , 2019, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Hailong Li,et al.  Amorphous Molybdenum Selenide Nanosheet as an Efficient Trap for the Permanent Sequestration of Vapor‐Phase Elemental Mercury , 2019, Advanced science.

[14]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  T. Bandiera,et al.  Nanocatalyst/Nanoplasmon-Enabled Detection of Organic Mercury: A One-Minute Visual Test. , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.

[16]  Hailong Li,et al.  Nanosized Copper Selenide Functionalized Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework‐8 (CuSe/ZIF‐8) for Efficient Immobilization of Gas‐Phase Elemental Mercury , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[17]  Lei Huang,et al.  A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  B. Wickman,et al.  Effective removal of mercury from aqueous streams via electrochemical alloy formation on platinum , 2018, Nature Communications.

[19]  R. Lalancette,et al.  Diferrocenylmercury-Bridged Diphosphine: A Chiral, Ambiphilic, and Redox-Active Bidentate Ligand. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  O. Magand,et al.  A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric mercury concentrations , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[21]  E. H. Steindal,et al.  Minamata Convention on Mercury: Chinese progress and perspectives , 2017 .

[22]  Christopher W. Moore,et al.  Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution , 2017, Nature.

[23]  A. Kis,et al.  2D transition metal dichalcogenides , 2017 .

[24]  A. Giang,et al.  Benefits of mercury controls for the United States , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Shuxiao Wang,et al.  Mercury transformation and speciation in flue gases from anthropogenic emission sources: a critical review , 2015 .

[26]  N. Yan,et al.  MnOx/Graphene for the Catalytic Oxidation and Adsorption of Elemental Mercury. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Updated emission inventories for speciated atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in China. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Hanqing Yu,et al.  FTIR and synchronous fluorescence heterospectral two-dimensional correlation analyses on the binding characteristics of copper onto dissolved organic matter. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Zhan Shi,et al.  Mercury nano-trap for effective and efficient removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  D. Krabbenhoft,et al.  Global Change and Mercury , 2013, Science.

[31]  Zhanhu Guo,et al.  A critical review on the heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in flue gases. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  B. M. Reddy,et al.  Abatement of Gas-Phase Mercury—Recent Developments , 2012 .

[33]  Feiyue Wang,et al.  Mercury‐selenium compounds and their toxicological significance: Toward a molecular understanding of the mercury‐selenium antagonism , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[34]  N. Ralston.  Nanomaterials: Nano-selenium captures mercury , 2008 .

[35]  A. E. Dowrey,et al.  Generalized Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy , 2000 .

[36]  Lisa L. Van Loon,et al.  Reduction of the Aqueous Mercuric Ion by Sulfite: UV Spectrum of HgSO3 and Its Intramolecular Redox Reaction , 2000 .

[37]  J. Jia,et al.  Catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury over the modified catalyst Mn/alpha-Al2O3 at lower temperatures. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.