Economic foundations of conjoint analysis

Abstract Observational data on either individual or aggregate demand is often not sufficient to identify consumer preferences due to lack of variation in prices or product features, or the desire to study product features not currently available. Choice-based conjoint analysis offers a solution to this problem by creating hypothetical product choices via experimental design and collecting demand data using survey methods. Choice-based conjoint designs can apply to a pure discrete choice model of demand in which consumers only purchase one unit from a set of products or to more general settings (termed “volumetric” conjoint analysis) in which consumers have the opportunity to purchase more than one product and to consume continuously variable quantities. This chapter provides the economic foundations for choice-based conjoint analysis along with efficient statistical methods for estimation and prediction of demand. We review the requirements that formal economic and statistical analyses impose on the design of conjoint surveys as well as the analysis of the conjoint survey data. A number of variations on conjoint analysis which appear in the literature do not conform to these requirements and, therefore, may provide erroneous inferences and predictions. We provide an example where both demand data and conjoint survey data are available for the same consumers and provide some conclusions regarding what aspects of preference estimation are consistent between actual marketplace data and conjoint survey data. All models and procedures in this chapter are available as R packages.

[1]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[2]  B. Orme Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research , 2005 .

[3]  Mitchell J. Lovett,et al.  Product Launches with New Attributes: A Hybrid Conjoint–Consumer Panel Technique for Estimating Demand , 2019 .

[4]  Mark Dickie,et al.  Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study , 1987 .

[5]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Consumer Choice in Real and Computer-simulated Environments , 1992 .

[6]  Rosa L. Matzkin Nonparametric identification and estimation of polychotomous choice models , 1993 .

[7]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  The Welfare Analysis of Product Innovations, with an Application to Computed Tomography Scanners , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Benefit Formation and Enhancement , 2020 .

[9]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[10]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.

[11]  Nino Hardt,et al.  Benefit-Based Conjoint Analysis , 2015 .

[12]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .

[13]  J. Townsend,et al.  Multialternative Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Connectionist Model of Decision Making , 2001 .

[14]  Peter Kurz,et al.  Omitted Budget Constraint Bias in Single-Unit Demand Models and Implications for Competitive Pricing and Targeting , 2020 .

[15]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Valuation of Patented Product Features , 2014 .

[16]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Explaining Preference Heterogeneity with Mixed Membership Modeling , 2017, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Attention, Information Processing and Choice in Incentive-Aligned Choice Experiments , 2018 .

[18]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[19]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Economic valuation of product features , 2014 .

[20]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[21]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  Min Ding An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism for Conjoint Analysis , 2007 .

[23]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[24]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Analysis of Conjoint Studies , 1995 .

[25]  Chan Su Park,et al.  Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement , 1997 .

[26]  Shari Seidman Diamond,et al.  Reference Guide on Survey Research , 2011 .

[27]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Using Discrete Choice Models with Experimental Design Data to Forecast Consumer Demand for a Unique Cultural Event , 1983 .

[28]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Economic Models of Choice , 2015 .

[29]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[30]  Emily Lancsar,et al.  Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. , 2004, Health economics.

[31]  Elie Ofek,et al.  How Much Does the Market Value an Improvement in a Product Attribute , 2002 .

[32]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Adaptive Self-Explication of Multiattribute Preferences , 2011 .

[33]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Incentive-Aligned Conjoint Analysis , 2005 .

[34]  Paul B. Ellickson,et al.  Product Launches with New Attributes: A Hybrid Conjoint–Consumer Panel Technique for Estimating Demand , 2017, Journal of Marketing Research.

[35]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands , 1991 .

[36]  Sidney Addelman,et al.  trans-Dimethanolbis(1,1,1-trifluoro-5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dionato)zinc(II) , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online.

[37]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[38]  Sanghak Lee,et al.  Price Promotions in Choice Models , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[39]  Rosa L. Matzkin Semiparametric Estimation of Monotone and Concave Utility Functions for Polychotomous Choice Models , 1991 .

[40]  William L. Moore,et al.  The no-choice option and dual response choice designs , 2006 .

[41]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[42]  K. Small,et al.  Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models , 1981 .

[43]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.