Editing for measurement errors is always part of data processing. In traditional editing, all data records are checked for errors and inconsistencies. In a new way of editing, only the subset with the most important erroneous responses is considered for editing. This approach is applied in selective editing procedures, which have been shown to save resources considerably. However, selective editing lacks a probabilistic basis and the properties of estimators cannot be established using standard methods. In particular, bias properties of the estimator are unknown except for level estimates based on historical data. This paper proposes combining selective editing with an editing procedure based on the traditional probability-sampling framework. The variance of a bias-corrected Horvitz-Thompson estimator is derived and a variance estimator is proposed. The results of a simulation study support the use of the combined editing procedure.
[1]
Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.
Model Assisted Survey Sampling
,
1997
.
[2]
F. S. P. Szuster,et al.
Nonsampling Error in Surveys
,
1994
.
[3]
A SELECTIVE EDITING METHOD CONSIDERING BOTH SUSPICION AND POTENTIAL IMPACT , DEVELOPED AND APPLIED TO THE SWEDISH FOREIGN TRADE STATISTICS
,
2005
.
[4]
Keith Farwell,et al.
The General Application of Significance Editing to Economic Collections Discussion Points for Mac
,
2004
.
[5]
John G. Kovar,et al.
Editing of Survey Data: How Much Is Enough?
,
1997
.
[6]
Seymour Sudman,et al.
Nonsampling Error in Surveys
,
1993
.
[7]
Dan Hedlin,et al.
Score Functions to Reduce Business Survey Editing at the U.K. Office for National Statistics
,
2003
.
[8]
J. Rao,et al.
Variance Estimation Under Stratified Two‐Phase Sampling with Applications to Measurement Bias
,
1997
.