Gaussian-noise discrimination and its relation to auditory object formation.

This study used a same/different experiment to assess the ability of human listeners to discriminate Gaussian-noise tokens with a spectral range of 350-850 Hz and a duration of 50 ms. For this duration, discrimination ability is high. However, when an identical 200-ms noise fringe with the same statistical properties as the 50-ms target tokens is appended to the end of the two target tokens, listeners show very poor discrimination. It was investigated whether altering the properties of the fringes with respect to those of the target improved the ability to discriminate the target tokens. This method was used to investigate the influence of changing fringe properties such as spectral range, level, interaural level difference, and interaural time delay on discrimination performance for the target. Spectral and temporal separation showed the strongest improvements, whereas no effect was found for doubling the fringe bandwidth, 5-dB level increases or decreases, or 10 dB interaural level differences. In the second experiment, subjects were asked to indicate whether they perceived one or two auditory objects for these stimuli. The results of the two experiments indicate that perceiving two objects is a necessary but not sufficient condition for good target discrimination.

[1]  L. V. Noorden Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[2]  M J Penner,et al.  Detection of temporal gaps in noise as a measure of the decay of auditory sensation. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T E Hanna,et al.  Discrimination of reproducible noise as a function of bandwidth and duration , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. Robin,et al.  On the perceived unitization of repetitive auditory patterns , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  N. Cowan Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[7]  T N Buell,et al.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. Yost Auditory image perception and analysis: The basis for hearing , 1991, Hearing Research.

[9]  J H Grose,et al.  The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  H S Colburn,et al.  Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C Trahiotis,et al.  The discrimination of samples of noise in monotic, diotic, and dichotic conditions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  C. J. Darwin,et al.  Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .

[13]  D. Grantham Chapter 9 – Spatial Hearing and Related Phenomena , 1995 .

[14]  C Alain,et al.  Selectively attending to auditory objects. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[15]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Effects of unit formation on the perception of a changing sound , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Ag Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  Processing capacity for perceptual information in Gaussian noise tokens , 2007 .

[18]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  On the ability to discriminate Gaussian-noise tokens or random tone-burst complexes. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.