An evaluation of the robustness of the Tanaka characterization protocol for reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns.

The robustness of the popular 'Tanaka' LC column characterization protocol has been evaluated by the statistical tools of reduced factorial design, multiple linear regression and principal component analysis. These have shown that in order to obtain reliable and reproducible results, it is especially important to control the methanol content, the temperature and, in the case of the total ion-exchange capacity test (alphaB/P pH 7.6), the pH of the mobile phase. In particular, the hydrophobicity tests (kPB and alphaCH2) are sensitive to small changes in methanol content. Provided that the operating parameters for the Tanaka column characterization protocol are controlled within the following experimental limits, i.e. methanol content +/-0.5% v/v, temperature +/-3degreesC, pH +/-0.10 and buffer concentration +/-2.0 mM, it is feasible to distinguish between RP materials that possess selectivity differences larger than their batch-to-batch reproducibility. These experimental requirements can be easily met by current LC instrumentation. Hence, the validity of the Tanaka testing protocol for characterizing columns has been verified.

[1]  M Mulholland,et al.  Full and fractionated experimental designs for robustness testing in the high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of codeine phosphate, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate in a pharmaceutical preparation. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[2]  Y Vander Heyden,et al.  Ruggedness testing of chromatographic methods: selection of factors and levels. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[3]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns. IV. Results obtained with Luna C18 (2) columns. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[4]  D. McCalley,et al.  Comparison of the performance of conventional C18 phases with others of alternative functionality for the analysis of basic compounds by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography , 1999 .

[5]  S. Wise,et al.  A new standard reference material for column evaluation in reversed-phase liquid chromatography , 2003 .

[6]  P. Petersson,et al.  Chromatographic classification and comparison of commercially available reversed-phase liquid chromatographic columns using principal component analysis. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  P. Petersson,et al.  Chromatographic classification and comparison of commercially available perfluorinated stationary phases for reversed‐phase liquid chromatography using Principal Component Analysis , 2003 .

[8]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Characterisation of reversed-phase liquid chromatographic columns by chromatographic tests. Evaluation of 36 test parameters: repeatability, reproducibility and correlation. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  R. Slingsby,et al.  Removal of metallic impurities from mobile phases in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography by the use of an in-line chelation column. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  J. Dolan,et al.  Control of column temperature in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  C. Cramers,et al.  Optimisation and characterisation of silica-based reversed-phase liquid chromatographic systems for the analysis of basic pharmaceuticals. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  Lloyd R. Snyder,et al.  Practical HPLC method development , 1988 .

[13]  J. Vial,et al.  Reversed-phase liquid chromatography column testing: robustness study of the test. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  M. Walters Classification of octadecyl-bonded liquid chromatography columns. , 1987, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[15]  M. Mulholland,et al.  Ruggedness testing in analytical chemistry , 1988 .

[16]  H. Fabre,et al.  Robustness testing in liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[17]  L. Snyder,et al.  Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography II. Effect of a change in conditions. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[18]  U. Neue,et al.  Universal procedure for the assessment of the reproducibility and the classification of silica-based reversed-phase packings: I. Assessment of the reproducibility of reversed-phase packings , 1999 .

[19]  R. Smith,et al.  Problems of the interlaboratory transferability of the measurement of the properties of a reversed-phase HPLC column , 2003 .

[20]  D. Massart,et al.  Minimal number of chromatographic test parameters for the characterisation of reversed-phase liquid chromatographic stationary phases. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .

[22]  U. Neue,et al.  Universal procedure for the assessment of the reproducibility and the classification of silica-based reversed-phase packings: II. Classification of reversed-phase packings , 1999 .

[23]  H. Ritchie,et al.  An evaluation of unbonded silica stationary phases for the separation of basic analytes using capillary electrochromatography , 2000 .

[24]  D. McCalley Influence of analyte stereochemistry and basicity on peak shape of basic compounds in high-performance liquid chromatography with reversed-phase columns, using pyridine and alkyl-substituted derivatives as probe compounds , 1994 .

[25]  K. Jinno,et al.  Chromatographic Characterization of Silica C18 Packing Materials. Correlation between a Preparation Method and Retention Behavior of Stationary Phase , 1989 .

[26]  H. Claessens Trends and progress in the characterization of stationary phases for reversed-phase liquid chromatography , 2001 .

[27]  D. W. Newton,et al.  pKa Values of Medicinal Compounds in Pharmacy Practice , 1978 .

[28]  L. Snyder,et al.  Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography I. A general quantitative relationship. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Chromatographic characterization of silica-based reversed phases , 1991 .

[30]  B. Buszewski,et al.  Comparative study of test methods for reversed-phase columns for high-performance liquid chromatography , 1998 .

[31]  J. Vial,et al.  Testing of "special base" columns in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. A rational approach considering solvent effects. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[32]  C. Cramers,et al.  Characterisation of reversed-phase liquid chromatography stationary phases for the analysis of basic pharmaceuticals: eluent properties and comparison of empirical test methods. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[33]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Chromatographic determination of metallic impurities in reversed-phase HPLC columns. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  C. Hackett,et al.  Chromatographic classification of commercially available reverse-phase HPLC columns , 1997 .

[35]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns. IV. Results obtained with Luna C18 (2) columns. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[36]  L. Snyder,et al.  Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography III. The physico-chemical basis of selectivity. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[37]  J. Veuthey,et al.  Simplification of a chromatographic test methodology for evaluation of base deactivated supports , 2002 .

[38]  U. Neue,et al.  Characterization of HPLC packings , 2003 .

[39]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns: I. Experimental protocol , 1999 .

[40]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on six batches of monolithic columns. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[41]  U. Neue,et al.  Dependence of reversed-phase retention of ionizable analytes on pH, concentration of organic solvent and silanol activity. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.