Comparison of the neurokinin-1 antagonist GR205171, alone and in combination with the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron, hyoscine and placebo in the prevention of motion-induced nausea in man.

AIMS In man a neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist has previously been shown to be ineffective in the prevention of motion-induced nausea. The antiemetic efficacy of NK1 receptor antagonists against chemotherapy-induced emesis is, however, enhanced when combined with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Hence the efficacy of the NK1 antagonist GR205171 in combination with the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron (Zofrantrade mark) was assessed in motion-induced nausea. METHODS GR205171 25 mg i.v., with and without concomitant administration of ondansetron 8 mg i.v., and hyoscine hydrobromide 0. 6 mg orally (positive control) were compared with placebo in a model of motion-induced nausea. The study was performed to a four-period, randomized, balanced, double-blind, crossover design in 16 healthy subjects. The end-point was the exposure to the motion stimulus required to produce moderate nausea in the subjects. RESULTS The motion stimulus required to produce moderate nausea was significantly greater for the positive control than placebo (P < 0. 001). There was no significant difference between either GR205171 or GR205171 plus ondansetron and placebo (P = 0.648 and 0.342, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The enhancement of NK1 receptor antagonist antiemetic activity through combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist is not replicated in motion-induced nausea.

[1]  M. Decramer,et al.  Comparison of L-758,298, a prodrug for the selective neurokinin-1 antagonist, L-754,030, with ondansetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[2]  Gavin Kilpatrick,et al.  GR205171: A novel antagonist with high affinity for the tachykinin NK1 receptor, and potent broad-spectrum anti-emetic activity , 1996, Regulatory Peptides.

[3]  M. Kris,et al.  Reduction of cisplatin-induced emesis by a selective neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist. L-754,030 Antiemetic Trials Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J F Golding,et al.  Comparison of the effects of a selective muscarinic receptor antagonist and hyoscine (scopolamine) on motion sickness, skin conductance and heart rate. , 1997, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[5]  R. Obach,et al.  The effect of CP‐99994 on the responses to provocative motion in the cat , 1997, British journal of pharmacology.

[6]  C. Bountra,et al.  Anti-emetic profile of a non-peptide neurokinin NK1 receptor antagonist, CP-99,994, in ferrets. , 1993, European journal of pharmacology.

[7]  G R Barnes,et al.  The effect on motion sickness and oculomotor function of GR 38032F, a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist with anti-emetic properties. , 1989, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  M. Kris,et al.  Use of an NK1 receptor antagonist to prevent delayed emesis after cisplatin. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  S. Silberman,et al.  Randomized phase II study of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist CJ-11,974 in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.