Do computer simulations really cognize?

Abstract Several common arguments against the claim that computers can cognize are based on the assumption that simulation can never be replication. In this article, simulation is defined as the construction of a device that represents the causal capacities of a system of interest. The relationship of simulation to theories and to replication is analysed, from which it is clear that it is possible for a simulation to be a replication if the device used can not only represent but also instantiate the same capacities as the system. Determining whether this is the case for computer simulations of cognition will require more coherent hypotheses than the symbol-processing hypothesis, and more cogent tests than Turing-type tests.

[1]  John Haugeland,et al.  Artificial intelligence - the very idea , 1987 .

[2]  Robert Cummins,et al.  Programs in the Explanation of Behavior , 1977, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology , 1981 .

[4]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[5]  R. Wilensky Computers, cognition and philosophy , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  J. Mey On being a model , 1982 .

[7]  Geoffrey Hunter What Computers Can't Do , 1988, Philosophy.

[8]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Mind, Language and Reality: The mental life of some machines , 1975 .

[9]  MICHAEL G. DYER,et al.  Intentionality and computationalism: minds, machines, Searle and Harnad , 1990, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[10]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, brains, and programs , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Kenneth Mark Colby,et al.  Clinical artificial intelligence , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Howard H. Pattee,et al.  Simulations, Realizations, and Theories of Life , 1987, ALIFE.

[13]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  Martin Ringle,et al.  Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence , 1980 .

[15]  G. Harman What is methodological solipsism? , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  The computer as a metaphor for psychological inquiry: Considerations and recommendations , 1986 .

[17]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Minds, machines and Searle , 1989, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[18]  R. Harvey,et al.  On the nature of programs, simulations, and organisms , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.