Knowledge Creation through University-Industry Collaborative Research Projects

It is obvious from the study of literature that university-industry (U-I) relationships and their subsequent knowledge transfers are topics of high political, economical, managerial and academic interest. Indeed, technological knowledge is seen as a major source of long-term economic growth and its transfer to the firm is critical since it acts as a significant innovation factor. In order to access this knowledge, a portfolio of sourcing strategies is available to the firm: knowledge creation through internal RandD departments, knowledge sharing with suppliers or market relationships, and also transfer from knowledge institutions such as public and private research centres. In this paper, we recognISe that University is a central source of knowledge but we question the general belief that knowledge is per se flowing between private and academic sphere through the conduct of University-Industry relationships. As a result, this paper presents our literature analysis concerning this research topic and explores one particular mean of inter-organisational knowledge transfer, namely the University-Industry collaborative research project. We present findings from an exploratory study, which aims at examining knowledge flows and collaborative behaviours at stake in such research projects. This interview survey has been realised with respondents actively involved in Belgian university-industry (U-I) interactions and provides qualitative data analysed through the theoretical framework of organisational knowledge creation developed by Nonaka and Takeuchi. We found evidence supporting the existence of a knowledge spiral as a dynamic for the whole projects and identified some knowledge-based limits to the reconciliation process between university’s interests and company’s needs.

[1]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[2]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[3]  Dennis A. Rondinelli National innovation systems: A comparative analysis , 1993 .

[4]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[5]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[6]  John Howells,et al.  A socio-cognitive approach to innovation , 1995 .

[7]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[8]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[9]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[10]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation , 1996 .

[11]  Andrew C. Inkpen Creating Knowledge through Collaboration , 1996 .

[12]  J. Marceau University—Industry—Government Relations , 1996 .

[13]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[14]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Creating effective University-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[15]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[16]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference , 1998 .

[17]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[18]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[19]  M. Hitt,et al.  Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay , 2000 .

[20]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[21]  John T. Scott,et al.  Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program , 2000 .

[22]  A. Agrawal University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[23]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy , 2001 .

[24]  Corinne Autant-Bernard,et al.  Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case , 2001 .

[25]  Charles W Wessner The Advanced Technology Program : assessing outcomes , 2001 .

[26]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[27]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects , 2002 .

[28]  Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez,et al.  Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations , 2004 .

[29]  Bronwyn H Hall University-Industry Research Partnerships in the United States , 2004 .

[30]  J. Reichman,et al.  The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods , 2004 .

[31]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[32]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Trust Mediation in Knowledge Management and Sharing , 2004, iTrust.

[33]  David A. Johnston,et al.  Organisational knowledge creating processes and the performance of university-industry collaborative R&D projects , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[34]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Bernard Marr Perspectives on Intellectual Capital , 2005, ECKM.

[36]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Universities as partners in U.S. research joint ventures. , 2005 .

[37]  Andrew L. S. Goh Harnessing knowledge for innovation: an integrated management framework , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[39]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .

[40]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[41]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[42]  Annick Castiaux,et al.  Radical innovation in established organizations: Being a knowledge predator , 2007 .