Intraorganizational Power and Organizational Design: Reconciling Rational and Coalitional Models of Organization

This paper contends that the analysis of organizational design and the analysis of intraorganizational power are inextricably intertwined for all major models of organization. While the coalitional model of organization is often viewed as the only model that explicitly links these topics, we argue that power does in fact play a central role in the traditional, rational model of organization, and that it is only the conception of intraorganizational power that differs between the two models. After contrasting the design prescriptions and power implications of the coalitional and rational models, the paper reconciles these two models by developing an “adaptively rational” model of organization that takes into account both the political dynamics and the task requirements of organizations.

[1]  Robert A. Day,et al.  A Review of the Current State of Negotiated Order Theory: an Appreciation and a Critique* , 1976 .

[2]  M. Olsen.  Recent Book: It Frightens Policemen: The Process of Social Organization — Power in Social Systems , 1979 .

[3]  L. Fry,et al.  Flexible manufacturing organiza-tions: implications for strategy fonnulation and organization design , 1988 .

[4]  Judith Dozier Hackman.  Power and Centrality in the Allocation of Resources in Colleges and Universities. , 1985 .

[5]  Allen G. Schick,et al.  University Budgeting: Administrative Perspective, Budget Structure, and Budget Process , 1985 .

[6]  G. Stalk.  Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .

[7]  J. Pennings,et al.  A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power , 1971 .

[8]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[9]  R. Shukla.  INFLUENCE OF POWER BASES IN ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION MAKING: A CONTINGENCY MODEL* , 1982 .

[10]  Robert B. Glassman,et al.  Persistence and loose coupling in living systems , 1973 .

[11]  Ramchandran Jaikumar,et al.  New technologies, obsolete organizations , 1988 .

[12]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[13]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Beyond Dyadic Exchange: Functional Interdependence and Sub-unit Power , 1990 .

[14]  C. Fombrun.  Intergroup processes: A micro-macro perspective , 1979 .

[15]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[16]  A. Pettigrew.  The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[17]  William J. Doll,et al.  Forging a Partnership to Achieve Competitive Advantage: The CIM Challenge , 1987, MIS Q..

[18]  Bart Victor,et al.  Interdependence: An Alternative Conceptualization , 1987 .

[19]  P. Abell.  Organizations as bargaining and influence systems , 1975 .

[20]  Stephen M. Shortell,et al.  New Organizational Forms for Enhancing Innovation: The Case of Internal Corporate Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[21]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[22]  R. Eccles.  The quasifirm in the construction industry , 1981 .

[23]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[24]  Kenneth D. Mackenzie,et al.  Organizational design : the organizational audit and analysis technology , 1986 .

[25]  Kenneth D. Mackenzie,et al.  Virtual Positions and Power , 1986 .

[26]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organization design: The case for a coalitional model of organizations , 1977 .

[27]  J. March.  The Business Firm as a Political Coalition , 1962, The Journal of Politics.

[28]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[29]  G. Klir,et al.  Trends in general systems theory , 1972 .

[30]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[31]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  The Bureaucratic Model in University Budgeting: An Alternative Explanation to Power , 1982 .

[32]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[33]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  Intraorganizational Distributions of Power: Replication Research , 1982 .

[34]  The Generality of the Strategic Contingencies Approach to Sub-unit Power , 1988 .

[35]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[36]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Resource Allocations in United Funds: Examination of Power and Dependence , 1977 .

[37]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Power in University Budgeting: A Replication and Extension. , 1980 .

[38]  A. Hawley.  Community Power and Urban Renewal Success , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[40]  J. Pennings,et al.  Structural conditions of intraorganizational power , 1974 .

[41]  Karl Mannheim,et al.  Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction: Studies in Modern Social Structure. , 1941 .

[42]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Fast-Cycle Capability for Competitive Power , 1988 .

[43]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a UniversityBudget. , 1974 .

[44]  P. Ekeh,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. , 1975 .

[45]  A. Strauss,et al.  Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. , 1979 .

[46]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. , 1974 .

[47]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[48]  Gareth Morgan,et al.  The Schismatic Metaphor and Its Implications for Organizational Analysis , 1981 .

[49]  Robert Dubin,et al.  Power, Function, and Organization , 1963 .

[50]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  A Political Approach to Organizations: A Review and Rationale , 1977 .