Reinstatement-induced recovery of a taste-LiCl association following extinction

Water-deprived rats were given a single exposure to saccharin and LiCl, either paired or unpaired. Half the subjects then received three saccharin-only exposures (extinction) in the training enclosure, followed by a single LiCl-only presentation (unconditioned stimulus reinstatement) 8 days after conditioning. The remaining subjects received six saccharin-only exposures, followed by LiCl reinstatement 13 days after conditioning. In both cases LiCl reinstatement occurred outside the training/test context. Appreciable recovery from extinction was observed after the partial loss of taste aversion obtained with three extinction sessions and the 8-day conditioning-reinstatement interval, but not after the asymptotic loss of taste aversion obtained with six extinction sessions and the 13-day conditioning-reinstatement interval. Conditioned taste aversions appear to be similar to more traditional associations with respect to both extinction and reinstatement-induced recovery from extinction. The results are discussed with reference to the event-memory, contextual-conditioning, and facilitated-retrieval hypotheses of postextinction reinstatement effects.

[1]  R. Rescorla.  Effect of US habituation following conditioning. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  John Garcia,et al.  Coyote Predation Control by Aversive Conditioning , 1974, Science.

[3]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  E. Holman.  The effect of drug habituation before and after taste aversion learning in rats , 1976 .

[5]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Recovery of the US representation over time during extinction , 1978 .

[6]  R. Bolles,et al.  Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  R. Mowrer,et al.  An extinction trial as a reminder treatment following electroconvulsive shock , 1980 .

[8]  B. Hars,et al.  Contextual cues and memory retrieval in rats: Alleviation of forgetting by a pretest exposure to background stimuli , 1980 .

[9]  V. Lolordo,et al.  The effect of post-conditioning exposure to morphine on the retention of a morphine-induced conditioned taste aversion , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[10]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Blocking as a Retrieval Failure: Reactivation of Associations to a Blocked Stimulus , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  K. Rusiniak,et al.  Flavor-illness aversions: potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats. , 1982, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[12]  M. Bouton.  Lack of reinstatement of an extinguished taste aversion , 1982 .

[13]  M. Domjan.  Biological constraints on instrumental and classical conditioning: implications for general process theory , 1983 .

[14]  David M. Sargent,et al.  The order of presentation of conditioned stimuli during extinction , 1983 .

[15]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Attenuation of Latent Inhibition by Post-Acquisition Reminder , 1984 .

[16]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories , 1984 .

[17]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Retrieval variability: sources and consequences. , 1986, The American journal of psychology.