A Geographic Routing Protocol Based on Trunk Line in VANETs

To make full use of historical information and realtime information, a Trunk Road Based Geographic Routing Protocol in Urban VANETs (TRGR) is proposed in this paper. This protocol aims to solve the problem of data acquisition in traditional trunk coordinated control system. Considering the actual physical characteristics of trunk lines, it makes full use of the traffic flow of the trunk lines and the surrounding road network, provides a real-time data transmission routing scheme, and gives a vehicle network routing protocol under this specific condition. At the same time, the TRGR protocol takes into account the data congestion problem caused by the large traffic flow of the main road, which leads to the corresponding increase of the information the flow of the section, and the link partition problem caused by the insufficient traffic flow. It introduces different criteria for judgment and selection, which makes the TRGR protocol more suitable for the application of coordinated control of the main road in the urban environment. Simulation results show that the TRGR protocol has better performance in end-to-end delay, delivery rate and routing cost under the scenario of urban traffic trunk lines comparing with other IOT routing protocols. TRGR protocol can effectively avoid data congestion and local optimum problems, effectively increase the delivery rate of data packets, and is suitable for routing requirements in this application scenario.

[1]  Jon W. Mark,et al.  Performance Analysis and Enhancement of the DSRC for VANET's Safety Applications , 2013, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[2]  Trung Q. Duong,et al.  A Novel Socially Stable Matching Model for Secure Relay Selection in D2D Communications , 2020, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[3]  Chen Chen,et al.  A GTS Allocation Scheme to Improve Multiple-Access Performance in Vehicular Sensor Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Susana Sargento,et al.  Deploying Roadside Units in Sparse Vehicular Networks: What Really Works and What Does Not , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Yun Yang,et al.  Chinese vehicle license plate recognition using kernel-based extreme learning machine with deep convolutional features , 2017 .

[6]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Simulation platform of LEO satellite communication system based on OPNET , 2018, Other Conferences.

[7]  Yun Yang,et al.  Improved Deep Hybrid Networks for Urban Traffic Flow Prediction Using Trajectory Data , 2018, IEEE Access.

[8]  Yanjing Sun,et al.  Hierarchical Matching With Peer Effect for Low-Latency and High-Reliable Caching in Social IoT , 2019, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[9]  Ning Zhang,et al.  A connectivity-aware intersection-based routing in VANETs , 2014, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[10]  Alexander Paier.  The end-to-end intelligent transport system (ITS) concept in the context of the european cooperative its corridor , 2015, 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM).

[11]  Mohammad Reza Monazzam,et al.  Weighting Criteria and Prioritizing of Heat stress indices in surface mining using a Delphi Technique and Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method , 2017, Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering.

[12]  Lei Liu,et al.  Latency estimation based on traffic density for video streaming in the internet of vehicles , 2017, Comput. Commun..

[13]  Trung Q. Duong,et al.  Inconspicuous Manipulation for Social-Aware Relay Selection in Flying Internet of Things , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[14]  Satish Anamalamudi,et al.  AODV routing protocol for Cognitive radio access based Internet of Things (IoT) , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[15]  Milena Radenkovic,et al.  GPSR-TARS: Congestion Aware Geographically Targeted Remote Surveillance for VANETs , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Networking (MoWNeT).

[16]  Imad Mahgoub,et al.  Anticipation and alert system of congestion and accidents in VANET using Big Data analysis for Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[17]  Ibtihal Mouhib,et al.  Network as a service for smart vehicles: A new comparative study of the optimized protocol Q-AODV and GPSR protocol , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS).

[18]  Guangsheng Yu,et al.  Using AHP, DEA and MPI for governmental research institution performance evaluation , 2018, Applied Economics.

[19]  Sagar Naik,et al.  Intersection-Based Geographical Routing Protocol for VANETs: A Proposal and Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[20]  Zhigang Xu,et al.  V2V‐based method for the detection of road traffic congestion , 2019, IET Intelligent Transport Systems.

[21]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  Multi-resolution Traffic Simulation for Large-Scale High-Fidelity Evaluation of VANET Applications , 2015 .

[22]  Cong Wang,et al.  A rear-end collision prediction scheme based on deep learning in the Internet of Vehicles , 2017, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[23]  Roman Obermaisser,et al.  Evaluation of Time-Triggered Traffic in Time-Sensitive Networks Using the OPNET Simulation Framework , 2018, 2018 26th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing (PDP).

[24]  Xiaohua Jia,et al.  Releasing Correlated Trajectories: Towards High Utility and Optimal Differential Privacy , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[25]  Chen Chen,et al.  A congestion avoidance game for information exchange on intersections in heterogeneous vehicular networks , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Lei Liu,et al.  A data dissemination scheme based on clustering and probabilistic broadcasting in VANETs , 2018, Veh. Commun..