Zscan4 promotes genomic stability during reprogramming and dramatically improves the quality of iPS cells as demonstrated by tetraploid complementation

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells generated using Yamanaka factors have great potential for use in autologous cell therapy. However, genomic abnormalities exist in human iPS cells, and most mouse iPS cells are not fully pluripotent, as evaluated by the tetraploid complementation assay (TCA); this is most likely associated with the DNA damage response (DDR) occurred in early reprogramming induced by Yamanaka factors. In contrast, nuclear transfer can faithfully reprogram somatic cells into embryonic stem (ES) cells that satisfy the TCA. We thus hypothesized that factors involved in oocyte-induced reprogramming may stabilize the somatic genome during reprogramming, and improve the quality of the resultant iPS cells. To test this hypothesis, we screened for factors that could decrease DDR signals during iPS cell induction. We determined that Zscan4, in combination with the Yamanaka factors, not only remarkably reduced the DDR but also markedly promoted the efficiency of iPS cell generation. The inclusion of Zscan4 stabilized the genomic DNA, resulting in p53 downregulation. Furthermore, Zscan4 also enhanced telomere lengthening as early as 3 days post-infection through a telomere recombination-based mechanism. As a result, iPS cells generated with addition of Zscan4 exhibited longer telomeres than classical iPS cells. Strikingly, more than 50% of iPS cell lines (11/19) produced via this “Zscan4 protocol” gave rise to live-borne all-iPS cell mice as determined by TCA, compared to 1/12 for lines produced using the classical Yamanaka factors. Our findings provide the first demonstration that maintaining genomic stability during reprogramming promotes the generation of high quality iPS cells.

[1]  Sheng Ding,et al.  Small molecules that modulate embryonic stem cell fate and somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[2]  P. Klatt,et al.  Telomerase reverses epidermal hair follicle stem cell defects and loss of long-term survival associated with critically short telomeres , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Scott W. Lowe,et al.  Stem cells: The promises and perils of p53 , 2009, Nature.

[4]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Cell Stem Cell Brief Report Ips Cells Can Support Full-term Development of Tetraploid Blastocyst-complemented Embryos Cell Stem Cell Brief Report , 2022 .

[5]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[6]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53–p21 pathway , 2009, Nature.

[7]  K. Caldecott,et al.  DNA strand break repair and human genetic disease. , 2007, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[8]  Krishanu Saha,et al.  Pluripotency and Cellular Reprogramming: Facts, Hypotheses, Unresolved Issues , 2010, Cell.

[9]  Yves Pommier,et al.  γH2AX and cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[10]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Yutao Du,et al.  Low incidence of DNA sequence variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells generated by nonintegrating plasmid expression. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[12]  P. Mombaerts,et al.  Nuclear Transfer-Mediated Rescue of the Nuclear Genome of Nonviable Mouse Cells Frozen Without Cryoprotectant , 2008, Biology of reproduction.

[13]  H. Lewin,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[14]  D. Keefe,et al.  Association of telomere length with authentic pluripotency of ES/iPS cells , 2011, Cell Research.

[15]  R. Stewart,et al.  Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.

[16]  Jennifer Nichols,et al.  Promotion of Reprogramming to Ground State Pluripotency by Signal Inhibition , 2008, PLoS biology.

[17]  Qi Zhou,et al.  iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation , 2009, Nature.

[18]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[19]  Geppino Falco,et al.  An in situ hybridization-based screen for heterogeneously expressed genes in mouse ES cells. , 2008, Gene expression patterns : GEP.

[20]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Richard A Young,et al.  Wnt signaling promotes reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[22]  T. Lange,et al.  DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres , 2003, Current Biology.

[23]  María A Blasco,et al.  Telomere Shortening and Tumor Formation by Mouse Cells Lacking Telomerase RNA , 1997, Cell.

[24]  Richard J. Giannone,et al.  An increase in telomere sister chromatid exchange in murine embryonic stem cells possessing critically shortened telomeres. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  P. Hogendoorn,et al.  Telomere‐associated proteins: cross‐talk between telomere maintenance and telomere‐lengthening mechanisms , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[26]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Julie V. Harness,et al.  Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[29]  M. Atasoy,et al.  The alteration of sister chromatid exchange frequencies in Behçet's disease with and without HLA‐B51 , 2006, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[30]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2 , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  M. Blasco,et al.  Telomere lengthening early in development , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[32]  G. Falco,et al.  Zscan4: a novel gene expressed exclusively in late 2-cell embryos and embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[33]  Andrew P. Feinberg,et al.  Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  Yixue Li,et al.  Different developmental potential of pluripotent stem cells generated by different reprogramming strategies. , 2011, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[35]  Geppino Falco,et al.  Zscan4 regulates telomere elongation and genomic stability in ES cells , 2010, Nature.

[36]  H. Schöler,et al.  A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[37]  Devanshi Jain,et al.  Telomeric strategies: means to an end. , 2010, Annual review of genetics.

[38]  T. de Lange How Telomeres Solve the End-Protection Problem , 2009, Science.

[39]  Han-Woong Lee,et al.  Dynamic rearrangement of telomeres during spermatogenesis in mice. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[40]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[41]  T. T. Su Cellular responses to DNA damage: one signal, multiple choices. , 2006, Annual review of genetics.

[42]  M. Ko,et al.  Zscan4 transiently reactivates early embryonic genes during the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[43]  M. Pera,et al.  Stem cells: The dark side of induced pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[44]  Tomohiro Kono,et al.  Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[45]  J. Bartek,et al.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency , 2009, Development.

[47]  Yoav Mayshar,et al.  Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[48]  Jiuhong Kang,et al.  E‐Cadherin‐Mediated Cell–Cell Contact Is Critical for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Generation , 2010, Stem cells.

[49]  H. Schöler,et al.  p53 connects tumorigenesis and reprogramming to pluripotency , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[50]  Uma Lakshmipathy,et al.  Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2013, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[51]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[52]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. , 2010, Genes & development.

[53]  E. Kirkness,et al.  Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.

[54]  S. Gagos,et al.  Molecular insights into the heterogeneity of telomere reprogramming in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Cell Research.

[55]  A. Consiglio,et al.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[56]  M. Blasco,et al.  Telomeres acquire embryonic stem cell characteristics in induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[57]  Stéphanie Boué,et al.  Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming à la carte , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[58]  Manuel Serrano,et al.  A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity , 2009, Nature.

[59]  Mika Sato-llic,et al.  for Dynamic Changes , 1998 .

[60]  M. Kyba,et al.  Human ES- and iPS-derived myogenic progenitors restore DYSTROPHIN and improve contractility upon transplantation in dystrophic mice. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[61]  S. Nishikawa,et al.  Equivalency of Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Embryonic Stem Cells to Those Derived from Fertilized Mouse Blastocysts , 2006, Stem cells.

[62]  G. Wahl,et al.  Linking the p53 tumor suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprogramming , 2009, Nature.

[63]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors , 2008, Nature.