Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 2000;35:707–711. RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES.To evaluate a novel MR enteroclysis technique for small-bowel imaging. METHODS.Twenty-one patients with suspected small-bowel disease underwent both MR and conventional enteroclysis. MR enteroclysis was performed by injecting an iso-osmotic water solution through a nasojejunal catheter with a flow rate of 80 to 150 mL/min. A maximum of 2 L of water solution was administered. A dynamic heavily T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence was applied in coronal orientation to monitor the bowel filling and adequate distention. Twelve 4-mm-thick slices were acquired by using a true fast imaging with steady-state precession (true-FISP) sequence during an 18-second breath-hold interval. Small-bowel distention, wall conspicuity, homogeneity of opacification, and the presence of artifacts were subjectively evaluated by two reviewers using five-point scales. RESULTS.Chemical shift artifacts were low and ghost artifacts were absent. Susceptibility artifacts were more prominent in the ileum; motion artifacts were low in the jejunum, ileum, and ileocecal area. Homogeneity of opacification was very good in the jejunum, good to very good in the ileum, and good in the ileocecal area. Distention was very good to excellent in the jejunum and ileum and very good in the ileocecal area. Wall conspicuity was very good to excellent in the jejunum and ileum. CONCLUSIONS.MR enteroclysis with the true-FISP sequence produced high-quality images of the small bowel. Further clinical studies are required to determine the clinical efficacy of the new technique compared with conventional enteroclysis.
[1]
Y. Ozaki,et al.
MR imaging of the small bowel using water as a contrast agent in a preliminary study with healthy volunteers.
,
1999,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[2]
T. Asselah,et al.
Breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging of Crohn's disease.
,
1998,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3]
I. Francis,et al.
MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
,
1997,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[4]
S. Faber,et al.
Pathologic conditions in the small bowel: findings at fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with an optimized suspension of oral magnetic particles.
,
1997,
Radiology.
[5]
R. Semelka,et al.
Small bowel neoplastic disease: Demonstration by MRI
,
1996,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[6]
P. Ros,et al.
Intraluminal contrast agents for MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis
,
1994,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[7]
T. Pilgram,et al.
MR imaging of crohn disease: Use of perflubron as a gastrointestinal contrast agent
,
1994,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[8]
D. Nolan,et al.
The small bowel enema: a ten year review.
,
1993,
Clinical radiology.
[9]
D. Mitchell,et al.
Comparison of Kaopectate with barium for negative and positive enteric contrast at MR imaging.
,
1991,
Radiology.
[10]
E M Haacke,et al.
Fast MR imaging: techniques and clinical applications.
,
1990,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.