CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model

While CEO job tenure is seen as influencing firm performance, the intervening mechanisms that govern this influence have remained largely unexplored. Given that individuals in the firm most closely influenced by the CEO are members of the top management team (TMT), we focus on the CEO-TMT interface as one important intervening mechanism. Specifically, our tested model suggests that CEO tenure indirectly influences performance through its direct influences on TMT risk-taking propensity and the firm's pursuit of entrepreneurial initiatives. Results from structural equation modeling are consistent with this model and support its associated hypotheses. In the discussion, we trace the implications of our study for research and practice. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[2]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads , 2001 .

[3]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[4]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[5]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior , 1992 .

[6]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The seasons of a CEO's tenure. , 1991, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[7]  Douglas W. Lyon,et al.  Inherent Limitations of Demographic Proxies in Top Management Team Heterogeneity Research , 1999 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[9]  Norwood Russell Hanson,et al.  The Logic of Discovery , 1958 .

[10]  Michael C. Sturman,et al.  Searching for the Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Between Time and Performance: Meta-Analyses of the Experience/Performance, Tenure/Performance, and Age/Performance Relationships , 2003 .

[11]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[12]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[13]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[14]  Edward Levitas,et al.  CEO Tenure And Company Invention Under Differing Levels of Technological Dynamism , 2005 .

[15]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[16]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  TESTING A MODEL OF REASONED RISK-TAKING: GOVERNANCE, THE EXPERIENCE OF PRINCIPALS AND AGENTS, AND GLOBAL STRATEGY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY IPO FIRMS , 2003 .

[17]  Ceo,et al.  Strategic Management Journal 4 , 1994 .

[18]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Goverance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities , 1996 .

[19]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[20]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Strategy‐making and environment: The third link , 1983 .

[21]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Top Management Team Risk Taking Propensities and Firm Performance: Direct and Moderating Effects , 2002, Journal of Business Strategies.