The Importance of Soil Moisture and Soil Structure for InSAR Phase and Backscatter, as Determined by FDTD Modeling

In this paper, we introduce a finite-difference time-domain simulator that accurately models the interaction of microwaves with realistic soils, specifically from spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). The modeled soils are characterized by surface roughness, correlation length, bulk moisture content, vertical moisture gradient, and small air-filled-void content. Simulation results include both backscatter and interferometric phase, and we are particularly interested in assessing the potential of the latter as a proxy for soil moisture. We find that differences in homogeneous bulk moisture result in only small phase differences (< 5?). In contrast, combinations of vertical moisture gradients and small air-filled voids, which may typically exist in more realistic soils, can produce phase changes > 30? for HH and > 50? for VV when the soil moisture is varied from 3% to 30% in the uppermost 2 cm of the soil. Phase changes of this magnitude are easily detectable by spaceborne InSAR techniques. While a strong phase response to a change in mean bulk moisture is common to vertical moisture gradient and small air-filled-void cases, their corresponding backscatter responses are very different. A vertical moisture gradient makes the backscatter response dramatically flatter compared with the case of uniform moisture; in contrast, the introduction of air-filled voids barely alters the backscatter. Thus, it may be possible to infer near-surface soil-structure parameters such as vertical gradients or fractions of voids and inhomogeneities from combined SAR phase and backscatter data. Future SAR sensors could be optimized for this purpose. Prior theoretical work based on the assumption of vertically uniform soil-moisture distributions may need to be adjusted, and the lack of a theory that accommodates more complex soil structures may explain why backscatter inversions have yet to result in a viable operational system.

[1]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[2]  Kun-Shan Chen,et al.  An update on the IEM surface backscattering model , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[3]  Pascale C. Dubois,et al.  Corrections to "Measuring Soil Moisture with Imaging Radars" , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Pascale C. Dubois,et al.  Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Yisok Oh,et al.  Quantitative retrieval of soil moisture content and surface roughness from multipolarized radar observations of bare soil surfaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Adrian K. Fung,et al.  Backscattering from a randomly rough dielectric surface , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  J. Kong,et al.  Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves, Numerical Simulations , 2001 .

[8]  Mahta Moghaddam,et al.  Electromagnetic Scattering From Multilayer Rough Surfaces With Arbitrary Dielectric Profiles for Remote Sensing of Subsurface Soil Moisture , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  HAS SAR FAILED IN SOIL MOISTURE RETRIEVAL ? , 2004 .

[10]  Philippe Paillou,et al.  Effect of multiple scattering on the phase signature of wet subsurface structures: applications to polarimetric L- and C-band SAR , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  J. Zenneck Über die Fortpflanzung ebener elektromagnetischer Wellen längs einer ebenen Leiterfläche und ihre Beziehung zur drahtlosen Telegraphie , 1907 .

[12]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: Differential radar interferometry , 1989 .

[13]  Dennis R. Fatland,et al.  DInSAR measurement of soil moisture , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Gerald N. Flerchinger,et al.  Simultaneous Heat and Water Model of a Freezing Snow-Residue-Soil System I. Theory and Development , 1989 .

[15]  Levent Gürel,et al.  Simulations of ground-penetrating radars over lossy and heterogeneous grounds , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  D. R. Fatland,et al.  Penetration depth as a DInSAR observable and proxy for soil moisture , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part 1: Empirical Models and Experimental Observations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  R. Bamler,et al.  Phase statistics of interferograms with applications to synthetic aperture radar. , 1994, Applied optics.