Interpreting stochastic agent-based models of cell death

Abstract Linking individual cell behavior to changes on the cell population and ultimately tissue scale is a key step towards connecting in vitro laboratory experiments to clinically relevant organ-scale behavior. For example, understanding how an individual tumor cell’s response to drug treatments propagates to the macroscale could help guide clinical decision making when tumors are located in high stakes regions. Based on how dying cells interact, macroscale tumor response can be dominated by tumor shrinkage, tumor damage, change in tumor porosity, or some combination of these phenomena. Here we focus on methods of modeling collective cell behavior with the overall goal of understanding how stochastic cell behavior will ultimately manifest on the cell population scale. To do this, we define and implement an agent-based model problem, introduce novel methods for interpreting simulation results, implement a recently developed technique for conducting a variance-based sensitivity analysis, and investigate key model parameters. Operating within an in silico framework allows us to compare our proposed methods with and without reproducible stochastic variations. This is critical because methods that will be functional for interpreting experimental data must also be able to function when aspects of stochastic variation are not reproducible. To demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods, we identify important simulation parameters for our agent-based model, show that two-dimensional and three-dimensional results are not directly equivalent, and highlight the macroscale implications of cell shrinkage. Looking forward, we anticipate that the methods and results presented here will contribute to significant future research in modeling stochastic cell behavior in the multiscale setting.

[1]  Charles Audet,et al.  A method for stochastic constrained optimization using derivative-free surrogate pattern search and collocation , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[3]  R. Baskar,et al.  Cancer and Radiation Therapy: Current Advances and Future Directions , 2012, International journal of medical sciences.

[4]  Erik Meijering,et al.  Methods for cell and particle tracking. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[5]  M. Miura,et al.  Live imaging of apoptosis in a novel transgenic mouse highlights its role in neural tube closure , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  James A. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction To Neural Networks , 1998 .

[7]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[8]  E. Bernhard,et al.  How does radiation kill cells? , 1999, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[9]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[10]  S. Silling,et al.  A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics , 2005 .

[11]  H. Steller,et al.  Shaping organisms with apoptosis , 2013, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[12]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory , 2010 .

[13]  Nicola Bellomo,et al.  On the foundations of cancer modelling: Selected topics, speculations, and perspectives , 2008 .

[14]  Selda Oterkus,et al.  Peridynamics for the solution of multiphysics problems , 2015 .

[15]  Ilias Bilionis,et al.  Predicting the effect of aging and defect size on the stress profiles of skin from advancement, rotation and transposition flap surgeries , 2019, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

[16]  C. Linder,et al.  Modeling mechanical inhomogeneities in small populations of proliferating monolayers and spheroids , 2017, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[17]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[19]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Multiscale cancer modeling. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: An Introduction , 2005 .

[21]  E Kuhl,et al.  Computational modeling of chemo-bio-mechanical coupling: a systems-biology approach toward wound healing , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  Dirk Drasdo,et al.  Individual-based and continuum models of growing cell populations: a comparison , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  L. Taber Biomechanics of Growth, Remodeling, and Morphogenesis , 1995 .

[24]  Krishna Garikipati,et al.  Machine learning materials physics: Surrogate optimization and multi-fidelity algorithms predict precipitate morphology in an alternative to phase field dynamics , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[25]  Victor K. Lai,et al.  A multiscale approach to modeling the passive mechanical contribution of cells in tissues. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[27]  Euan A. Ashley,et al.  Deep Learning Automates the Quantitative Analysis of Individual Cells in Live-Cell Imaging Experiments , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Alain Goriely,et al.  A physics-based model explains the prion-like features of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2019, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

[29]  J. Friedman Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1990 .

[30]  A. C. M. Resende,et al.  A HYBRID THREE-SCALE MODEL OF TUMOR GROWTH. , 2018, Mathematical models & methods in applied sciences : M3AS.

[31]  S. Silling Reformulation of Elasticity Theory for Discontinuities and Long-Range Forces , 2000 .

[32]  E Lejeune,et al.  Understanding the relationship between cell death and tissue shrinkage via a stochastic agent-based model. , 2018, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Will Usher,et al.  SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, J. Open Source Softw..

[34]  Alen Alexanderian,et al.  Efficient Computation of Sobol' Indices for Stochastic Models , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[35]  S. Silling,et al.  Peridynamic States and Constitutive Modeling , 2007 .

[36]  Yusheng Feng,et al.  A fully coupled space-time multiscale modeling framework for predicting tumor growth. , 2017, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[37]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Cell Stiffness Is a Biomarker of the Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  Dirk Drasdo,et al.  Off-Lattice Agent-Based Models for Cell and Tumor Growth: Numerical Methods, Implementation, and Applications , 2018 .

[39]  R. Lehoucq,et al.  Peridynamic Theory of Solid Mechanics , 2010 .

[40]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. , 2011, The Analyst.

[41]  E. Kuhl,et al.  Understanding the mechanical link between oriented cell division and cerebellar morphogenesis. , 2019, Soft matter.

[42]  D. Drasdo,et al.  A single-cell-based model of tumor growth in vitro: monolayers and spheroids , 2005, Physical biology.

[43]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  Erkan Oterkus,et al.  Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications , 2013 .

[45]  G. Majno,et al.  Apoptosis, oncosis, and necrosis. An overview of cell death. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[46]  G. An,et al.  Agent‐based models in translational systems biology , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[47]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[48]  Dirk Drasdo,et al.  Agent-Based Lattice Models of Multicellular Systems , 2018 .

[49]  P. Ciarletta,et al.  Solid Tumors Are Poroelastic Solids with a Chemo-mechanical Feedback on Growth , 2017, Journal Of Elasticity.

[50]  J. Humphrey,et al.  A Computational Model of the Biochemomechanics of an Evolving Occlusive Thrombus , 2017 .

[51]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[52]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Dual‐horizon peridynamics , 2015, 1506.05146.

[53]  C. Linder,et al.  Modeling tumor growth with peridynamics , 2017, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[54]  T. Stylianopoulos The Solid Mechanics of Cancer and Strategies for Improved Therapy. , 2017, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[55]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  The Shrinking Brain: Cerebral Atrophy Following Traumatic Brain Injury , 2018, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[57]  Joseph D Butner,et al.  Simulating cancer growth with multiscale agent-based modeling. , 2015, Seminars in cancer biology.

[58]  C. Linder,et al.  Quantifying the relationship between cell division angle and morphogenesis through computational modeling. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.