Nuclear Power and Sustainable Energy Policy: Promises and Perils

The challenges and opportunities of nuclear power in meeting the projected large absolute increase in energy demand, especially electricity, throughout the industrialized and developing world, while helping to mitigate the threat of climate change. A significant global nuclear power deployment would engender serious risks related to proliferation, safety, and waste disposal. Unlike renewable sources of energy, nuclear power is an unforgiving technology because human lapses and errors can have ecological and social impacts that are catastrophic and irreversible. However, according to some analysts, advances in the design of nuclear reactors may have reduced their associated risks and improved their performance. Moreover, while a variety of renewable energy sources (hydro, wind, modern biomass, solar) will play important roles in the transition to a low-carbon economy, some analysts perceive that nuclear power is the only proven technology for generating electricity that is both largely carbon-free, not location specific (as with wind, hydro and solar), and amenable to significant scaling up. Thus given the projections of threats from climate change, and if the considerable strain experienced by world energy markets in recent years is a harbinger of things to come, then there is a rationale for examining the pros and cons of nuclear power as a supply option within low-carbon strategies. It should be noted that despite the emerging centrality of climate change and security of supply in the energy policy debate, nuclear power is still viewed with a great deal of skepticism and in fact continues to elicit considerable opposition. Indeed the views on nuclear power in the context of sustainable energy policy are highly divergent. A thorough evaluation of all aspects of the issue is warranted.

[1]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The economic future of nuclear power , 2009, Daedalus.

[2]  H. Rogner,et al.  Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development , 2010 .

[3]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations , 2007 .

[4]  Pratibha A. Gokhale,et al.  Accelerator driven systems (ADS) for energy production and waste transmutation : International trends in R&D , 2006 .

[5]  P. James The future of coal , 1982 .

[6]  S. E. Ireland Energy Prices and Taxes , 2009 .

[7]  Marc Schattenmann,et al.  IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency , 2000, A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations.

[8]  Simon Buckle,et al.  Mitigation of climate change , 2009, The Daunting Climate Change.

[9]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[10]  William J. Nuttall,et al.  Nuclear Power: A Hedge against Uncertain Gas and Carbon Prices? , 2006 .

[11]  A. Froggatt,et al.  The economics of nuclear power , 2007 .

[12]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[13]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Modeling Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in Energy and Economic Models , 2003 .

[14]  Atsushi Iimi,et al.  Estimating Global Climate Change Impacts on Hydropower Projects: Applications in India, Sri Lanka and Vietnam , 2007 .

[15]  David J. C. MacKay Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air , 2008 .

[16]  E. Fisher,et al.  Mighty mice , 2000, Nature.

[17]  D. Finon,et al.  Financing Arrangements and Industrial Organisation for New Nuclear Build in Electricity Markets , 2008 .

[18]  L. Clarke,et al.  Managing the transition to climate stabilization , 2007 .

[19]  Tarek Hegazy Simplified project management for Construction practitioners , 2006 .

[20]  A. Stirling,et al.  Science and precaution in the appraisal of electricity supply options. , 2001, Journal of hazardous materials.

[21]  D. Kinly,et al.  Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts , 2006 .

[22]  A. Brolly,et al.  Concept of a small-scale electron accelerator driven system for nuclear waste transmutation: Part 2. Investigation of burnup , 2005 .

[23]  James A. Baker SMALL INNOVATIVE REACTOR DESIGNS - USEFUL ATTRIBUTES AND STATUS OF TECHNOLOGY , 2001 .

[24]  H. Hampel,et al.  Supply of uranium , 1973 .

[25]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The future of nuclear power in the United States : economic and regulatory challenges , 2006 .

[26]  A. Meyer Economics Of Climate Change , 1995, Nature.

[27]  B. Frois Advances in Nuclear Energy , 2005 .

[28]  J. E. Kenton,et al.  Guide to nuclear power technology , 1984 .

[29]  Valuation and optionality of large energy industry capital investments , 2006 .

[30]  Simon Taylor Privatisation and Financial Collapse in the Nuclear Industry: The Origins and Causes of the British Energy Crisis of 2002 , 2007 .

[31]  Nathan S. Lewis,et al.  Solar energy conversion. , 2007 .

[32]  R. Cantor,et al.  The economics of nuclear power: Further evidence on learning, economies of scale, and regulatory effects , 1988 .

[33]  H. A. Feiveson Comments on the Development Path Needed for Proliferation-Resistant Nuclear Power , 2001 .

[34]  A. Bartle Hydropower potential and development activities , 2002 .

[35]  Nigel Mortimer Nuclear power and global warming , 1991 .

[36]  P. Joskow Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment , 2005 .

[37]  David S. Ortiz,et al.  Producing Liquid Fuels from Coal: Prospects and Policy Issues , 2008 .

[38]  G. Rothwell A real options approach to-evaluating new nuclear power plants , 2006 .

[39]  P. Wallace The Union of Concerned Scientists , 2008 .

[40]  N W Brown,et al.  Nuclear Power, Small Nuclear Technology, and the Role of Technical Innovation: An Assessment , 2001 .

[41]  C. L. Archer,et al.  Evaluation of global wind power , 2005 .

[42]  I. Gorst Survey of energy resources , 1985 .

[43]  K. Ramler,et al.  Can nuclear power compete in the new German market , 1998 .