Hierarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic

Abstract. Using resource selection functions, we examined habitat selection patterns of barren-ground grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the central Canadian Arctic among and within home ranges. There was no difference between the sexes with regard to habitat selection patterns at the home range level (Wilks' λ, approx. F11,11=1.27, P=0.37). Bear home ranges contain more esker habitat, tussock/hummock successional tundra, lichen veneer, birch seep, and tall shrub riparian areas relative to the proportional availability of habitats in the study area. We observed differences in habitat selection within home ranges among levels of sex/reproductive status (Wilks' λ, approx. F20,412=3.32, P<0.001) and by season (Wilks' λ, approx. F30,605=2.71, P<0.001). Eskers and tall shrub riparian zones were the habitats most preferred by bears throughout the year. Tussock/hummock successional tundra was also favored by males at varying times during the year and lichen veneers were favored in spring and autumn by most bears. Females with cubs tended to avoid the highest ranked habitat for males throughout the year. This pattern of habitat selection was not observed for females without accompanying young. Results of this study underline the importance of scale dependence in habitat selection. Failure to view habitat selection as a hierarchical process may result in a narrow and possibly misleading notion of habitat selection patterns.

[1]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[2]  James F. Wittenberger,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales in Habitat Selection , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[3]  B. Worton.  Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators , 1995 .

[4]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[5]  N. Fowler.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT POPULATION REGULATION IN A , 1986 .

[6]  Richard D. Mace,et al.  Spatial and temporal interaction of male and female grizzly bears in northwestern Montana , 1997 .

[7]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: the effects of spatial scale , 1987 .

[8]  John G. Kie,et al.  Sexual segregation in black-tailed deer : effects of scale , 1996 .

[9]  J. Craighead,et al.  Age Determination of Grizzly Bears from Fourth Premolar Tooth Sections , 1970 .

[10]  R. Welsch.  Stepwise Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1977 .

[11]  Laurence D. Roy,et al.  Coyote movements, habitat use, and vulnerability in central Alberta , 1985 .

[12]  DENSITY-DEPENDENT POPULATION REGULATION , 1991 .

[13]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[14]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[15]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Relating populations to habitats. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[17]  Philip D. McLoughlin,et al.  Overcoming radiotelemetry bias in habitat- selection studies , 1999 .

[18]  R. Harris.  Tracking wildlife by satellite : current systems and performance / by Richard B. Harris ... [et al.]. , 2018 .

[19]  Derek W. Bailey,et al.  Large Herbivore Foraging and Ecological HierarchiesLandscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory , 1987 .

[20]  D. F. Penner,et al.  Feeding Patterns of Barren-ground Grizzly Bears in the Central Canadian Arctic , 2002 .

[21]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[22]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  M. Boyce,et al.  Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Tests of hypotheses for sexual segregation in grizzly bears , 1995 .

[25]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Sexual segregation and female grizzly bear avoidance of males , 1994 .

[26]  Timothy D. Reynolds,et al.  STUDY DESIGNS AND TESTS FOR COMPARING RESOURCE USE AND AVAILABILITY , 1990 .

[27]  J. A. Schaefer,et al.  Habitat selection as a hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskoxen , 1995 .

[28]  B. Silverman.  Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[29]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[30]  Bruce J. Worton,et al.  Optimal smoothing parameters for multivariate fized and adaptive kernel methods , 1989 .

[31]  J. Hechtel.  Activity and food habits of barren-ground grizzly bears in arctic Alaska , 1985 .

[32]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .