A Monte Carlo Reliability Study of the Assessment of Chemotherapy Responses in Ovarian Cancer Treatment

In ovarian cancer treatment there is no single standard criterion adopted for chemotherapy responses assessment. CA-125 is widely used to evaluate chemotherapy responses and doctors experience still play an important role in the judgment of chemotherapy response. It is noted that there are cases whose CA125 values are in the same range but classified differently. The situation becomes complicated as gene profile study provides an alternative for the chemotherapy response prediction, i.e., the assessments based on CA125 are inconsistent with that indicated by the identified gene markers. In this study, we propose a framework to evaluate those cases which are at odds under different criteria. Monte Carlo simulation is designed to evaluate the cases whose values of CA125 fall in the critical range and inconsistent with assessments based upon gene markers. This study also provides framework to analyze doctors' prior on the judgment of chemotherapy response. This work also can be easily applied to other cancer chemotherapy response research.

[1]  Robert A. Stine,et al.  An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods , 1989 .

[2]  S M Bentzen,et al.  Use of tumour markers in monitoring the course of ovarian cancer. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  Anne-Marie Mes-Masson,et al.  Microarray analysis of gene expression mirrors the biology of an ovarian cancer model , 2001, Oncogene.

[4]  Amy P N Skubitz,et al.  Differential gene expression in ovarian carcinoma: identification of potential biomarkers. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[5]  M Markman,et al.  A proposal to use CA-125 to evaluate activity of new antineoplastic agents in ovarian cancer. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  Markman The Role of CA-125 in the Management of Ovarian Cancer. , 1997, The oncologist.

[7]  B. Song,et al.  Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors , 2007 .

[8]  L. Case,et al.  CA‐125 Values Predictive of Clinical Response during Second‐Line Chemotherapy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 1989, American journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  G. Rustin,et al.  Use of CA-125 to assess response to new agents in ovarian cancer trials. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Gene expression patterns in ovarian carcinomas. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  H E Lambert,et al.  Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Lihua Li,et al.  An across Factor Normalization Based SVD Approach to Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles for Uncovering Biomarkers in Ovarian Carcinoma Chemotherapy Responses , 2008, 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  R. Bast,et al.  Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.