The 90-Day Mortality After Pancreatectomy for Cancer Is Double the 30-Day Mortality: More than 20,000 Resections From the National Cancer Data Base

BackgroundOperative mortality traditionally has been defined as the rate within 30 days or during the initial hospitalization, and studies that established the volume–outcome relationship for pancreatectomy used similar definitions.MethodsPancreatectomies reported to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) during 2007–2010 were examined for 30- and 90-day mortality. Unadjusted mortality rates were compared by type of resection, stage, comorbidities, and average annual hospital volume. Hierarchical logistic regression models generated risk-adjusted odds ratios for 30- and 90-day mortality.ResultsAfter 21,482 pancreatectomies, the unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was 3.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.4–3.9 %), which doubled at 90 days to 7.4 % (95 % CI 7.0–7.8). The unadjusted and risk-adjusted mortality rates were higher at 30 days with increasing age, increasing stage, male gender, lower income, low hospital volume, resections other than distal pancreatectomy, Medicare or Medicaid insurance coverage, residence in a Southern census division, history of prior cancer, and multiple comorbidities. The lowest-volume hospitals (<5 per year) performed 19 % of the pancreatectomies, with a risk-adjusted odds ratios for mortality that were 4.2 times higher (95 % CI 3.1–5.8) at 30 days and remained 1.9 times higher (95 % CI 1.5–2.3) at 30–90 days compared with hospitals that had high volumes (≥40 per year).ConclusionMortality rates within 90 days after pancreatic resection are double those at 30 days. The volume–outcome relationship persists in the NCDB. Reporting mortality rates 90 days after pancreatectomy is important. Hospitals should be aware of their annual volume and mortality rates 30 and 90 days after pancreatectomy and should benchmark the use of high-volume hospitals.

[1]  J. Chmiel,et al.  National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer. Results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[2]  J. Tielsch,et al.  The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High‐Risk Surgical Procedure , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[3]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. , 1996, The Western journal of medicine.

[4]  W. Kirwan,et al.  Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Relation of Perioperative Deaths to Hospital Volume Among Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for Malignancy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[6]  C. Begg,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  M. Winget,et al.  A comparison of charlson and elixhauser comorbidity measures to predict colorectal cancer survival using administrative health data , 2011, Cancer.

[8]  Hude Quan,et al.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo Methods of Comorbidity Measurement in Administrative Data , 2004, Medical care.

[9]  C. Steiner,et al.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. , 1998, Medical care.

[10]  G. Koch,et al.  National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients , 2002, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  T. To,et al.  Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[12]  C. Ko,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base: A Powerful Initiative to Improve Cancer Care in the United States , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.