Does an inhibitory action of levodopa contribute to motor fluctuations?

The possibility that levodopa can both acutely improve as well as worsen motor function was investigated in eight fluctuating parkinsonian patients by administering 2-hour infusions of placebo and of levodopa at suprathreshold, threshold, and subthreshold rates when the subjects had been without medication overnight. Plasma levodopa and clinical status were monitored for an hour before, during, and for 3 hours after the infusions. Placebo infusions were associated with a mild deterioration in motor status during the period of monitoring. Subthreshold infusions were associated with greater motor deterioration than were placebo infusions in five of six subjects, but this deterioration did not occur in any specific temporal relation to the infusion. Threshold infusion rates in three subjects produced a transient improvement in motor function followed by deterioration to below the scores during the hour preceding the infusion and then returned to baseline. Suprathreshold rates in seven of the eight subjects were associated with motor improvement for 1/2 to 31/2 hours followed by worsening to below baseline for 30 to 90 minutes and then spontaneous improvement to baseline function. These observations suggest that levodopa causes an acute deterioration in motor function following drug-induced improvement. Thus, the nadir of motor function in levodopa-treated patients may not be simply loss of dopaminergic stimulation and return to the untreated state, but may represent an inhibitory effect of levodopa.

[1]  A. Lees,et al.  On-off fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. A clinical and neuropharmacological study. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. D. Parkes,et al.  Fluctuations of disability in Parkinson's disease – clinical aspects , 1981 .

[3]  M. Muenter,et al.  L-dopa therapy of Parkinson's disease: plasma L-dopa concentration, therapeutic response, and side effects. , 1971, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  "On-off" phenomenon in Parkinson's disease. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. J. Bradbury,et al.  Inhibition and facilitation of motor responding of the mouse by actions of dopamine agonists in the forebrain , 1984, Neuropharmacology.

[6]  J. Costentin,et al.  Pharmacological characteristics of dopamine receptors involved in the dual effect of dopamine agonists on yawning behaviour in rats. , 1983, European journal of pharmacology.

[7]  A. Antonini,et al.  [On-off phenomena in Parkinson's disease. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation]. , 1987, La Clinica terapeutica.

[8]  S. Fahn Fluctuations of disability in Parkinson's disease: pathophysiology , 1981 .

[9]  J. Nutt,et al.  Clinical and biochemical studies with controlled‐release levodopa/carbidopa , 1986, Neurology.

[10]  W. E. Martin,et al.  Patterns of clinical response and plasma dopa levels in Parkinson's disease , 1975, Neurology.

[11]  Y. Agid,et al.  Onset and end-of-dose levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Possible treatment by increasing the daily doses of levodopa. , 1978, Archives of neurology.

[12]  M. Muenter,et al.  Patterns of dystonia ("I-D-I" and "D-I-D-") in response to l-dopa therapy for Parkinson's disease. , 1977, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  L. Paalzow,et al.  Opposing effects of apomorphine on pain in rats. Evaluation of the dose-response curve. , 1983, European journal of pharmacology.

[14]  E. W. Maynert,et al.  ACUTE TOLERANCE TO INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICS IN DOGS , 1960 .

[15]  Lennart K. Paalzow,et al.  Concentration‐response relations for apomorphine effects on heart rate in conscious rats * , 1986, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.