Standards for testing freeform measurement capability of optical and tactile coordinate measuring machines

For decades three-dimensional (3D) measurements of engineering components have been made using fixed metrology-room based coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) fitted most commonly with single point or to a much lesser extent, scanning tactile probes. Over the past decade there has been a rapid uptake in development and subsequent use of portable optical-based 3D coordinate measuring systems. These optical-based systems capture vast quantities of point data in a very short time, often permitting freeform surfaces to be digitized. Documented standards, for example ISO 10360, for the verification of fixed CMMs fitted with tactile probes are now widely available, whereas verification procedures and more specifically verification artefacts for optical-based systems are still in their infancy. Furthermore, the industry is seeking traceability in 3D measurements of high precision components. A recent requirement is the demand for highly accurate measurements of large gears with diameters up to 1000 mm as used in gear boxes of wind turbines. Up until now it has been impossible to ensure traceability of 3D measurements of big gears, since no traceable standards were available. This paper describes three different types of artefacts that were developed during the project, namely tetrahedron artefacts for testing the basic measurement capability of optical 3D devices, freeform verification artefacts for testing the capability of measuring complex geometry, and a large gear artefact for task related calibration of different types of CMMs. In addition, artefact calibration data and associated measurement uncertainties and international intercomparisons are presented. These developments will be of considerable value to end users, calibration laboratories and producers of optical and tactile CMMs.

[1]  S. Osawa,et al.  Traceability strategy for gear-pitch-measuring instruments: development and calibration of a multiball artifact , 2009 .

[2]  Stephen B. Brown,et al.  NPL freeform artefact for verification of non-contact measuring systems , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Marjan Družovec,et al.  SIMULATION OF LINE SCALE CONTAMINATION IN CALIBRATION UNCERTAINTY MODEL , 2008 .

[4]  Edward P. Morse,et al.  Measurement uncertainty in the performance verification of indicating measuring instruments , 2012 .

[5]  Jovan Bojkovski,et al.  Measurement uncertainty, traceability and evaluation of test results in testing laboratories , 2002 .

[6]  Emmett Curran,et al.  Quick check error verification of coordinate measuring machines , 2004 .

[7]  R. Steiner.  History and progress on accurate measurements of the Planck constant , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[8]  Peter M. Harris,et al.  Measurement uncertainty and traceability , 2006 .

[9]  Robert J. Hocken,et al.  Development of a parametric model and virtual machine to estimate task specific measurement uncertainty for a five-axis multi-sensor coordinate measuring machine , 2011 .

[10]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  Traceability for Areal Surface Texture Measurement , 2010 .

[11]  G N Rodger,et al.  A review of industrial capabilities to measure free-form surfaces. , 2007 .

[12]  M. Lalor,et al.  A new phase-to-height model for measuring object shape using collimated projections of structured light , 2005 .

[13]  Leonard Steinborn.  International Organization for Standardization ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems — Requirements , 2004 .