Coordination, learning, and delay

This paper studies how the introduction of social learning with costs to delay affects coordination games with incomplete information. We present a tractable noisy dynamic coordination game with social learning and costs to delay. We show that this game has a unique monotone equilibrium. A comparison of the equilibrium of the dynamic game with the equilibria of analogous static coordination games explicates the role of social learning. The analysis is carried out for both endogenous and exogenous order of moves in the dynamic game. In the limit as noise vanishes, social welfare is strictly ranked in these games, with the highest welfare achieved in the dynamic game with endogenous ordering. We demonstrate that exogenous asynchronicity is not a substitute for endogenous asynchronicity. We also show that under endogenous ordering, as noise vanishes, the efficiency of coordination is maximized at intermediate costs to delay. The robustness of these results is illustrated numerically away from the complete information limit, when closed forms are not available. Our results have implications for the initial public offerings of debt, as well as for the adoption of new technology under incomplete information.

[1]  S. Morris,et al.  Global Games: Theory and Applications , 2001 .

[2]  A. Dasgupta Social Learning with Payo Complementarities , 2000 .

[3]  J. Choi Herd Behavior, the "Penguin Effect", and the Suppression of Informational Diffusion: An Analysis of Informational Externalities and Payoff Interdependency , 1997 .

[4]  Itay Goldstein,et al.  Demand Deposit Contracts and the Probability of Bank Runs , 2002 .

[5]  D. M. Frankel Payoff Shocks and Equilibrium Selection with Endogenous Flexibility , 2001 .

[6]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[7]  Christophe Chamley Dynamic Speculative Attacks , 2003 .

[8]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[9]  Ady Pauzner,et al.  Resolving Indeterminacy in Dynamic Settings: The Role of Shocks , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen Morris,et al.  Equilibrium Selection in Global Games with Strategic Complementarities , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  S. Morris,et al.  Unique Equilibrium in a Model of Self-Fulfilling Currency Attacks" American Economic Review , 1996 .

[12]  H. Carlsson,et al.  Global Games and Equilibrium Selection , 1993 .

[13]  K. Burdzy,et al.  Fast Equilibrium Selection by Rational Players Living in a Changing World , 2001 .

[14]  Leslie M. Marx,et al.  Dynamic Voluntary Contribution to a Public Project , 2000 .

[15]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Dynamic coordination games , 1995 .

[16]  A. Dasgupta,et al.  Social Learning with Payoff Complementarities , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Business as Usual, Market Crashes, and Wisdom after the Fact , 1994 .

[18]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Information Revelation and Strategic Delay in a Model of Investment , 1994 .