Preamble: From Models to Modeling

The objective of this chapter is to situate this book by giving a global overview of the history of the change in perspectives on symbolizing and modeling in the mathematics education community. This history describes a shift from the use of symbols and models as embodiments of mathematical concepts and objects in instructional practice, design and theory, to explorations in semiotics as a central field of interest. Underlying this shift is a shift from correspondence theories of truth to contextualist theories of truth. The latter category encompasses constructivism and socio-cultural theory, which constitute the main background theories that are currently adopted in the mathematics education community. The chapter starts with a discussion of two instruction theories that have incorporated the classical use of manipulative materials and visual models. These concem the so-called ‘mapping theory’, which has emerged within the context of information-processing theory, and Gal’perin’s theory of the stepwise formation of mental actions. Next follows a sketch of the constructivist critique. This is followed by a discussion of the role of (cultural) tools from a socio-cultural perspective. Finally the change in ways of describing and conceptualizing symbolizations that has emerged recently is addressed. In relation to this, the semiotic notion of a sign as an integrated signifier/signified pair is discussed. This is complemented with a discussion of the notion of an inscription as the material correlate of a sign, and of the instrumentation of ict tools.

[1]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[2]  Guy Brousseau,et al.  Le contrat didactique : le milieu , 1990 .

[3]  Valerie Walkerdine,et al.  The Mastery of Reason , 1988 .

[4]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice , 1998 .

[5]  H. Freudenthal Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures , 1983 .

[6]  Yves Chevallard,et al.  Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique : perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique , 1991 .

[7]  N. Balacheff,et al.  Didactique et intelligence artificielle , 1994 .

[8]  H.J.M. van Oers The appropriation of mathematical symbols. A psychosemiotic approach to mathematics learning. , 1999 .

[9]  Luciano Meira,et al.  The Microevolution of Mathematical Representations in Children's Activity , 1995 .

[10]  Ricardo Nemirovsky On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and the velocity sign , 1994 .

[11]  P. Rabardel Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains , 1995 .

[12]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays , 1981 .

[13]  Jean-Baptiste Lagrange,et al.  Complex calculators in the classroom: theoretical and practical reflections on teaching pre-calculus , 1999, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[14]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[15]  Luc Trouche,et al.  La parabole du gaucher et de la casserole à bec verseur: ètude des processus d'apprentissage dans un environnement de calculatrices symboliques , 2000 .

[16]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Symbolizing, Modeling, and Instructional Design , 2000 .

[17]  P. Cobb,et al.  A Constructivist Alternative to the Representational View of Mind in Mathematics Education. , 1992 .

[18]  Heinz Werner,et al.  Symbol formation : an organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought , 1964 .

[19]  Michèle Artigue,et al.  Le Logiciel ‘Derive’ comme revelateur de phenomenes didactiques lies a l'utilisation d'environnements informatiques pour l'apprentissage , 1997 .

[20]  E. Corte,et al.  Making sense of word problems , 2000 .