PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE FOR OFFICE PRINCIPALS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR OFFICE AUTOMATION

In the first part of this article models for productivity and the quality of working life are developed that show that there are a number of common elements, particularly those related to motivation. On the basis of a review of the published literature of case histories, as well as those cases with which we are familiar from our own experience, it seems clear that job satisfaction is the most significant sociological factor in enhancing productivity, and the quality of working life, especially for professional and management workers. In addition, it seems clear that a sense of autonomy and achievement are probably the most significant elements of job satisfaction and that, at least for this category of workers, productivity and the quality of working life are complementary objectives whose realisation may best be achieved together. We support this theme by analysing a number of case histories on the basis of the job satisfaction model. Finally, we suggest that careful attention should be paid, in the earliest stages of setting objectives, and later in planning for office automation, to identifying the types and levels of job satisfaction needs that are important for the staff to be supported with technology. It is important that management's objectives in this respect should be explicitly stated so that the technology may be specified and designed in such a way that the desired objectives are met.

[1]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  A study of perceived need satisfactions in bottom and middle management jobs. , 1961 .

[2]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Job attitudes in management: I. Perceived deficiencies in need fulfillment as a function of job level. , 1962 .

[3]  Judi Marshall,et al.  MANAGERs' JOB PERCEPTIONS. PART II: OPPORTUNITIES FOR, AND ATTITUDES TO, CHOICE , 1981 .

[4]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. , 1972 .

[5]  Gerald J. Gorn,et al.  Job involvement and motivation: Are intrinsically motivated managers more job involved? , 1980 .

[6]  Newton Margulies,et al.  MULTIPLE IMPACTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE AND INDIVIDUAL VALUE SYSTEMS UPON JOB SATISFACTION , 1969 .

[7]  Gwen C. Edwards,et al.  Organizational impacts of office automation , 1978 .

[8]  Margrethe H. Olson,et al.  Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time , 1983, CACM.

[9]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Job attitudes in management: II. Perceived importance of needs as a function of job level. , 1963 .

[10]  L. S. Baumann,et al.  Automated workflow control: a key to office productivity , 1980, AFIPS '80.

[11]  Richard M. Steers.  Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness , 1975 .

[12]  E. A. Locke,et al.  PERCEIVED DETERMINANTS OF HIGH AND LOW PRODUCTIVITY IN THREE OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS: A CRITICAL INCIDENT STUDY [1] , 1981 .

[13]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Job attitudes in mangement: III. Perceived deficiencies in need fulfillment asa function of line versus staff type of job. , 1963 .

[14]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice , 1982, CACM.

[15]  Jon English,et al.  Productivity: A New Perspective , 1983 .

[16]  G. Graen,et al.  The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. , 1982 .

[17]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Organizational climate: Relationship to organizational structure, process and performance , 1974 .

[18]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Job attitudes in management: IV. Perceived deficiencies in need fulfillment as a function of size of company. , 1963 .

[19]  Judi Marshall,et al.  MANAGERs' JOB PERCEPTIONS. PART I: THEIR OVERALL FRAMEWORKS AND WORKING STRATEGIES , 1981 .