Linker length and composition influence the flexibility of Oct‐1 DNA binding

POU domain transcription factors have two separate helix–turn–helix DNA‐binding subdomains, the POU homeodomain (POUhd) and the POU‐specific domain (POUs). Each subdomain recognizes a specific subsite of 4 or 5 bp in the octamer recognition sequence. The Oct‐1 POU subdomains are connected by a 23 amino acid unstructured linker region. To investigate the requirements for the linker and its role in DNA recognition, we constructed POU domains in which the subdomains are connected with linkers varying in length between 2 and 37 amino acids. Binding to the natural octamer site required a minimal linker length of between 10 and 14 amino acids. A POU domain with an eight amino acid linker, however, had a high affinity for a site in which the POUs recognition sequence was inverted. Computer modelling shows that inversion of the POUs subdomain shortens the distance between the subdomains sufficiently to enable an eight amino acid linker to bridge the distance. DNase I footprinting as well as mutation of the POUs‐binding site confirms the inverted orientation of the POUs domain. Switching of the POUs and POUhd subdomains and separation by 3 bp leads to a large distance which could only be bridged effectively by a long 37 amino acid linker. In addition to linker length, mutation of a conserved glutamate residue in the linker affected binding. As shown by surface plasmon resonance measurements, this was caused by a decrease in the on‐rate. Our data indicate that there are both length and sequence requirements in the linker region which allow flexibility leading to selective binding to differently spaced and oriented subsites.

[1]  H. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Mutation of the Oct-1 POU-specific recognition helix leads to altered DNA binding and influences enhancement of adenovirus DNA replication. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  R. Roeder,et al.  Cloning, functional characterization, and mechanism of action of the B-cell-specific transcriptional coactivator OCA-B , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  C. Pabo,et al.  Oct-1 POU domain-DNA interactions: cooperative binding of isolated subdomains and effects of covalent linkage. , 1996, Genes & development.

[4]  P. Kraulis.  A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[5]  H. Schöler,et al.  Octamania: the POU factors in murine development. , 1991, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[6]  P. Wright,et al.  The solution structure of the Oct-1 POU-specific domain reveals a striking similarity to the bacteriophage λ repressor DNA-binding domain , 1993, Cell.

[7]  P. Sharp,et al.  Structure-based design of transcription factors. , 1995, Science.

[8]  V. Mahdavi,et al.  A new bipartite DNA-binding domain: cooperative interaction between the cut repeat and homeo domain of the cut homeo proteins. , 1994, Genes & development.

[9]  Mark J Alkema,et al.  The DNA binding specificity of the bipartite POU domain and its subdomains. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[10]  J. Manfredi,et al.  Spacing and orientation of bipartite DNA-binding motifs as potential functional determinants for POU domain factors. , 1993, Genes & development.

[11]  W. Herr,et al.  A single amino acid exchange transfers VP16-induced positive control from the Oct-1 to the Oct-2 homeo domain. , 1992, Genes & development.

[12]  W. Herr,et al.  The POU domain: versatility in transcriptional regulation by a flexible two-in-one DNA-binding domain. , 1995, Genes & development.

[13]  W. Herr,et al.  Mechanisms for flexibility in DNA sequence recognition and VP16-induced complex formation by the Oct-1 POU domain , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[14]  R. Maurer,et al.  In Vivo Mutational Analysis of the DNA Binding Domain of the Tissue-specific Transcription Factor, Pit-1 (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  P. O’Hare,et al.  Site-specific conformational alteration of the Oct-1 POU domain-DNA complex as the basis for differential recognition by Vmw65 (VP16) , 1994, Cell.

[16]  I. Brooks,et al.  Determination of rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance: use of nonlinear least squares analysis methods. , 1993, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  C. Hovens,et al.  A B-cell coactivator of octamer-binding transcription factors , 1995, Nature.

[18]  W. A. Johnson,et al.  Distinct variant DNA-binding sites determine cell-specific autoregulated expression of the Drosophila POU domain transcription factor drifter in midline glia or trachea , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  R. Kaptein,et al.  Solution structure of the POU-specific DNA-binding domain of Oct-1 , 1993, Nature.

[20]  C. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of a five-finger GLI-DNA complex: new perspectives on zinc fingers. , 1993, Science.

[21]  R. Kaptein,et al.  Solution structure of the Oct-1 POU homeodomain determined by NMR and restrained molecular dynamics , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[22]  A. Vershon,et al.  Altered DNA Recognition and Bending by Insertions in the α2 Tail of the Yeast a1/α2 Homeodomain Heterodimer , 1995, Science.

[23]  J. Newell,et al.  OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins , 1995, Cell.

[24]  Juli D. Klemm,et al.  Crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain bound to an octamer site: DNA recognition with tethered DNA-binding modules , 1994, Cell.

[25]  M. Gstaiger,et al.  The B cell coactivator Bob1 shows DNA sequence‐dependent complex formation with Oct‐1/Oct‐2 factors, leading to differential promoter activation. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[26]  C. Wolberger,et al.  Crystal Structure of the MATa1/MATα2 Homeodomain Heterodimer Bound to DNA , 1995, Science.

[27]  G. Evans,et al.  Chromosomal structure and expression of the human OTF1 locus encoding the Oct-1 protein. , 1993, Genomics.

[28]  W. Herr,et al.  Segments of the POU domain influence one another's DNA-binding specificity , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices , 1994, Cell.

[30]  P. Urbánek,et al.  Short introns interrupting the Oct-2 POU domain may prevent recombination between POU family genes without interfering with potential POU domain 'shuffling' in evolution. , 1994, Biological chemistry Hoppe-Seyler.

[31]  M. Weiss,et al.  Biochemical characterization of the Oct-2 POU domain with implications for bipartite DNA recognition. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[32]  Steven N. Hird,et al.  Targeted mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans POU homeo box gene ceh-18 cause defects in oocyte cell cycle arrest, gonad migration, and epidermal differentiation. , 1994, Genes & development.

[33]  P. Sharp,et al.  Recognition of the surface of a homeo domain protein. , 1992, Genes & development.

[34]  C. Verrijzer,et al.  POU proteins bend DNA via the POU‐specific domain. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[35]  C. Verrijzer,et al.  The oct-1 homeo domain contacts only part of the octamer sequence and full oct-1 DNA-binding activity requires the POU-specific domain. , 1990, Genes & development.

[36]  C. Verrijzer,et al.  POU domain transcription factors from different subclasses stimulate adenovirus DNA replication. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  A tissue-specific transcription factor containing a homeodomain specifies a pituitary phenotype , 1988, Cell.

[38]  F. Studier,et al.  Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[39]  M. Weiss,et al.  An invariant asparagine in the POU-specific homeodomain regulates the specificity of the Oct-2 POU motif. , 1994, Biochemistry.