Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the short-, intermediate-, and longer-term outcomes after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), including both AAA-related and all-cause mortality. BACKGROUND Endovascular stent graft placement for AAA has gained broad acceptance as an alternative to open surgical repair due to a lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. The intermediate- and long-term all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality vary among studies. Thus, we sought to perform a meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for treating AAA. METHODS Electronic databases were queried for identification of prospective, randomized trials of open surgery versus endovascular stent graft repair of AAA. A total of 10 published papers reporting on 6 studies at different follow-up intervals were identified; they involved 2,899 patients with AAA repair procedures, of whom, 1,470 underwent endovascular stent graft AAA exclusion and 1,429 were treated by open AAA repair. RESULTS At 30 days, the pooled relative risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the endovascular group (relative risk [RR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19 to 0.64) than in the open surgery group. At intermediate follow-up, the all-cause mortality had a nonsignificant difference (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.08), the AAA-related mortality was significantly lower (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.74) and reintervention rates were higher (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08) in the endovascular group than in the open surgery group. At long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.15) or AAA-related mortality (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.20 to 12.74), whereas the significant difference in the rate of reinterventions persisted (RR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.08). CONCLUSIONS In patients randomized to open or endovascular AAA repair, all-cause perioperative mortality, as well as AAA-related mortality at short- and intermediate-term follow-up are lower in patients undergoing endovascular stent graft placement. This was associated with greater reintervention in the endovascular group noted at intermediate follow-up. Long-term survival appears to converge between the 2 groups.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  S. Stavropoulos,et al.  Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  G. Soulez,et al.  Pain and quality of life assessment after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients at low risk. , 2005, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[4]  Diederick E Grobbee,et al.  Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Laheij,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes following Elective Open or Endovascular AAA Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[6]  Raghu Kacker,et al.  Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[7]  Jean Marzelle,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  EVAR trial participants,et al.  Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[9]  K. Johnston,et al.  Nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: six-year follow-up results from the multicenter prospective Canadian aneurysm study. Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Aneurysm Study Group. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  R. Lovegrove,et al.  A meta‐analysis of 21 178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  G. Moneta,et al.  Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Open Repair in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30-Day Operative Mortality Results: Randomised Controlled Trial , 2006 .

[12]  J. Sterne,et al.  Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  J. Parodi,et al.  Placement of endovascular stented grafts via remote access sites: A new approach to the treatment of failed aortoiliofemoral reconstructions , 1995, Annals of vascular surgery.

[14]  D. C. Brewster,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  John V. White,et al.  ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography , 2006, Circulation.

[16]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  J. Parodi,et al.  Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms , 1991, Annals of vascular surgery.

[18]  Erik Buskens,et al.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Hb Nijmegen,et al.  Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2005 .

[20]  R. Fattori,et al.  Degenerative aneurysm of the descending aorta. Endovascular treatment. , 2007, Multimedia manual of cardiothoracic surgery : MMCTS.

[21]  A. Bradbury,et al.  A 21‐year experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm operations in Edinburgh , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  F. Veith,et al.  Transfemoral Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 1994 .

[23]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. , 2009, JAMA.

[24]  J. Seeger,et al.  Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Versus Open Repair in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1): Randomised Controlled Trial , 2006 .

[25]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  C. van Walraven,et al.  Long-term outcomes and resource utilization of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Ontario. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  T. Wilt,et al.  Systematic Review: Repair of Unruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  B. Gersh,et al.  Influence of coronary artery disease on morbidity and mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy: a population-based study, 1971-1987. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  G. L. Moneta.  Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2010 .

[30]  P. Gaines,et al.  Short-term (30-day) outcome of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurism: results from the prospective Registry of Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurism (RETA). , 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[31]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Ang , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  H. Takagi,et al.  Regarding "long-term outcomes and resource utilization of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Ontario". , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[34]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Two-Year Outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2005 .

[35]  T. Huber.  A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients , 2012 .

[36]  Pascal Desgranges,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience , 2000 .

[37]  Y. van der Graaf,et al.  Influence of study design on reported mortality and morbidity rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[38]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.