Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification

Abstract This study evaluated the synergistic use of high spatial resolution multispectral imagery (i.e., QuickBird, 2.4 m) and low-posting-density LIDAR data (3 m) for forest species classification using an object-based approach. The integration of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data was considered during image segmentation and the subsequent object-based classification. Three segmentation schemes were examined: (1) segmentation based solely on the spectral image layers; (2) segmentation based solely on LIDAR-derived layers; and (3) segmentation based on both the spectral and LIDAR-derived layers. For each segmentation scheme, objects were generated at twelve different scales in order to determine optimal scale parameters. Six categories of classification metrics were generated for each object based on spectral data alone, LIDAR data alone and the combination of both data sources. Machine learning decision trees were used to build classification rule sets. Quantitative segmentation quality assessment and classification accuracy results showed the integration of spectral and LIDAR data, in both image segmentation and object-based classification, improved the forest classification compared to using either data source independently. Better segmentation quality led to higher classification accuracy. The highest classification accuracy (Kappa = 91.6%) was acquired when using both spectral- and LIDAR-derived metrics based on objects segmented from both spectral and LIDAR layers at scale parameter 250, where best segmentation quality was achieved. Optimal scales were analyzed for each segmentation-classification scheme. Statistical analysis of classification accuracies at different scales revealed that there was a range of optimal scales that provided statistically similar accuracy.

[1]  J. A. Tullis,et al.  Synergistic Use of Lidar and Color Aerial Photography for Mapping Urban Parcel Imperviousness , 2003 .

[2]  D. A. Hill,et al.  Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis , 2003 .

[3]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner , 2004 .

[4]  S. Franklin,et al.  Geostatistical and texture analysis of airborne-acquired images used in forest classification , 2004 .

[5]  T. Blaschke.  TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR CHANGE DETECTION BASED ON IMAGE OBJECTS , 2005 .

[6]  Chad Hendrix,et al.  A Comparison of Urban Mapping Methods Using High-Resolution Digital Imagery , 2003 .

[7]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[8]  M. Wulder,et al.  Forest inventory height update through the integration of lidar data with segmented Landsat imagery , 2003 .

[9]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles , 1998 .

[10]  S. Walsh.  Coniferous tree species mapping using LANDSAT data , 1980 .

[11]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS- MODIS , 1996 .

[12]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Estimation of optimal image object size for the segmentation of forest stands with multispectral IKONOS imagery , 2008 .

[13]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[15]  James Llinas,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1990 .

[16]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman Cutler classifications (RandomForest) , 2006 .

[17]  Peter T. Wolter,et al.  Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery , 1995 .

[18]  J. Reitberger,et al.  Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees , 2008 .

[19]  E Brown de Colstoun,et al.  National Park vegetation mapping using multitemporal Landsat 7 data and a decision tree classifier , 2003 .

[20]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[21]  S. Franklin.  Using spatial Co-occurrence texture to increase forest structure and species composition classification accuracy , 2001 .

[22]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[23]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Remote Sensing , 2009 .

[24]  Tomas Brandtberg.  Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[25]  Ross A. Hill,et al.  Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LiDAR data , 2005 .

[26]  Martin Volk,et al.  The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[27]  D. Roberts,et al.  Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales , 2005 .

[28]  T. Blaschke,et al.  Object-based contextual image classification built on image segmentation , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[29]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Object-Based Land Cover Classification Using High-Posting-Density LiDAR Data , 2008 .

[30]  Peng Gong,et al.  Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery , 2004 .

[31]  J. R. Quinlan,et al.  Data Mining Tools See5 and C5.0 , 2004 .

[32]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[33]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Handbook of pattern recognition and image processing , 1986 .

[34]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Species identification of individual trees by combining high resolution LiDAR data with multi‐spectral images , 2008 .

[35]  Lindi J. Quackenbush,et al.  INVESTIGATING NEW ADVANCES IN FOREST SPECIES CLASSIFICATION , 2007 .

[36]  E. Davidson,et al.  Classifying successional forests using Landsat spectral properties and ecological characteristics in eastern Amazônia , 2003 .

[37]  P. Treitz,et al.  Integrating spectral, spatial, and terrain variables for forest ecosystem classification , 2000 .

[38]  G. Hay,et al.  Object-Based Image Analysis , 2008 .

[39]  P. Gong,et al.  Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery , 2006 .

[40]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object-Based Image Analysis , 2008 .

[41]  Hao Chen,et al.  Processing Hyperion and ALI for forest classification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[42]  Mary E. Martin,et al.  Determining Forest Species Composition Using High Spectral Resolution Remote Sensing Data , 1998 .

[43]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Comparison of pixel- and object-based sampling strategies for thematic accuracy assessment , 2008 .

[44]  S. Franklin,et al.  OBJECT-BASED ANALYSIS OF IKONOS-2 IMAGERY FOR EXTRACTION OF FOREST INVENTORY PARAMETERS , 2006 .

[45]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification , 2003 .

[46]  N. Coops,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Remotely Sensed Data for Ecosystem Characterization , 2004 .

[47]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Quality assessment of segmentation results devoted to object-based classification , 2008 .

[48]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Object‐based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation , 2008 .

[49]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .