A multi-anchoring approach in mobile IP networks

Many recent mobility solutions, including derivatives of the well-known Mobile IP as well as emerging protocols employed by future Internet architectures, propose to realize mobility management by distributing anchoring nodes Home Agents or other indirection agents over the Internet. One of their main goals is to address triangle routing by optimizing routes between mobile nodes and correspondent nodes. Thus, a key component of such proposals is the algorithm to select proper mobility anchoring nodes for mobile nodes. However, most current solutions adopt a single-anchoring approach, which means each mobile node attaches to a sole mobility anchor at one time. In this paper, "we argue that the single-anchoring approach has drawbacks when facing various mobility scenarios. Then, we offer a novel multi-anchoring approach that allows each mobile node to select an independent mobility anchor for each correspondent node. We show that in most cases our proposal gains more performance benefits with an acceptable additional cost by evaluation based on real network topologies. For the cases that lead to potential high cost, we also provide a lightweight version of our solution which aims to preserve most performance benefits while keeping a lower cost. At last, we demonstrate how our proposal can be integrated into current Mobile IP networks. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Distributed and Dynamic Mobility Management in Mobile Internet: Current Approaches and Issues , 2011, J. Commun..

[2]  Dino Farinacci,et al.  LISP Mobile Node , 2016 .

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised , 2010, RFC.

[4]  Lusheng Wang,et al.  Novel MAP Selection Scheme Using Location History in Hierarchical MIPv6 Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[5]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[6]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  FIRST , 2018, ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks.

[7]  Günter Schäfer,et al.  A Distributed IP Mobility Approach for 3G SAE , 2008, 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[8]  Jun Murai,et al.  Migrating home agents towards internet-scale mobility deployments , 2006, CoNEXT '06.

[9]  SuKyoung Lee,et al.  QoS-aware dynamic MAP selection schemes in HMIPv6 networks , 2012, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[10]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Internet indirection infrastructure , 2002, SIGCOMM 2002.

[11]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Distributed Mobility Management: Current Practices and Gap Analysis , 2015, RFC.

[12]  Jianping Pan,et al.  An overview of DNS-based server selections in content distribution networks , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[14]  Jsc Bh Euclidean distance-based QoS metric for dynamic MAP selection in HMIPv6 network , 2015 .

[15]  Telemaco Melia,et al.  Distributed mobility management: A standards landscape , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Carmen Guerrero,et al.  P2P Based Architecture for Global Home Agent Dynamic Discovery in IP Mobility , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[17]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  An adaptive mobility anchor point selection scheme in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 networks , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[18]  C. Kumar,et al.  Adaptive mobility anchor point to reduce regional registration and packets delivery costs , 2014, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[19]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Host Mobility Using an Internet Indirection Infrastructure , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[20]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[21]  Jun Bi,et al.  Software-Defined Mobility Support in IP Networks , 2016, Comput. J..

[22]  Jonathan M. Smith,et al.  DHARMA: distributed home agent for robust mobile access , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[23]  K. Murakami,et al.  A multilevel hierarchical distributed IP mobility management scheme for wide area networks , 2002, Proceedings. Eleventh International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[24]  H Anthony Chan Proxy mobile IP with distributed mobility anchors , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[25]  Bu-Sung Lee,et al.  Enabling Inter-PMIPv6-Domain Handover with Traffic Distributors , 2010, 2010 7th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[26]  Ming-Jen Huang,et al.  Study of Heuristic MAP Selection and Abstraction Schemes with Load Balance in HMIPv6 , 2011, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[27]  Hsiao-Hwa Chen,et al.  On a moving direction pattern based MAP selection model for HMIPv6 networks , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[28]  Huaqiang Yuan,et al.  Active overload prevention based adaptive MAP selection in HMIPv6 networks , 2014, Wirel. Networks.

[29]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  A hybrid centralized-Distributed Mobility Management for supporting highly mobile users , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[30]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management , 2008, RFC.

[31]  Mohamed Othman,et al.  Mobility management for IP-based next generation mobile networks: Review, challenge and perspective , 2012, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[32]  James Kempf,et al.  Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping in Split Scenario , 2007, RFC.

[33]  Abderrahim Benslimane,et al.  Dynamic anchor points selection for mobility management in Software Defined Networks , 2015, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..