Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Codeine Using Tooth Pulp Evoked Potentials

Pain assessment in human volunteers is difficult, and it often requires a large number of subjects to show analgesic efficacy with statistical significance. Electrical tooth pulp stimulation elicits a painful sensation and produces an electroencephalographic (EEG) signal that can be recorded from the scalp when precisely controlled dental stimuli are delivered. These somatosensory evoked potentials (EP) consist of a series of peaks or waves each characterized by their polarity, latency, and amplitude. They are obtained by processing the EEG signals that occur after tooth pulp stimulation. There is good correlation between subjective pain reports and evoked potential amplitudes (N150‐P250 component). Thus, EP may provide a useful model for the assessment of analgesic activity in human volunteers. We describe an improved method for producing and recording tooth pulp evoked potentials in six healthy subjects. Only 16 EEG epochs were necessary to get a reproducible EP response from the participants. The approach was applied to study the efficacy of codeine (60 mg administered orally); a decrease in the evoked potential amplitudes after codeine administration was observed. The data were consistent with results from visual analog pain ratings given by the subjects.

[1]  R. Coppola,et al.  Opiate pharmacology and individual differences. II. Somatosensory evoked potentials , 1981, PAIN.

[2]  H. Derendorf,et al.  Relationship between saliva levels of metamizol metabolites, bioavailability and analgesic efficacy. , 1983, Arzneimittel-Forschung.

[3]  Burkhart Bromm,et al.  Antagonism between tilidine and naloxone on cerebral potentials and pain ratings in man. , 1983 .

[4]  Andrew C. N. Chen,et al.  Brain evoked potentials are functional correlates of induced pain in man , 1979, PAIN.

[5]  E. C. Huskisson,et al.  Graphic representation of pain , 1976, Pain.

[6]  C. Chapman.  Brain evoked potentials as correlates of laboratory pain: A review and perspective , 1979 .

[7]  C. E. Elger,et al.  Changes in cortical evoked potentials as correlates of the efficacy of weak analgesics , 1982, Pain.

[8]  C. Chapman,et al.  Measurement of clinical pain a review and integration of research findings , 1984 .

[9]  P. Wall.  Pain Measurement in Man. Neurophysiological Correlates of Pain. , 1986 .

[10]  C. Benedetti,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of analgesia; comparison of fentanyl, acupuncture, and nitrous oxide , 1982, Pain.

[11]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Naloxone alters pain perception and somatosensory evoked potentials in normal subjects , 1977, Nature.

[12]  M. Soso,et al.  electrical stimulation of tooth pulp in humans. II. Qualities of sensations , 1982, Pain.

[13]  C. Elger,et al.  Quantifizierung der Dämpfung in der Schmerzempfindung mit Hilfe evozierter Potentiale nach Gabe schwacher Analgetika , 1980 .

[14]  E. Lettich,et al.  Cerebral responses to electrical tooth pulp stimulation in man , 1975, Neurology.

[15]  M. Soso,et al.  Electrical stimulation of tooth pulp in humans. I. Relationships among physical stimulus intensities, psychological magnitude estimates and cerebral evoked potentials , 1982, Pain.

[16]  H. Hill,et al.  Dose effects of alfentanil in human analgesia , 1986, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  S. Harkins,et al.  Cerebral evoked potentials to noxious dental stimulation: relationship to subjective pain report. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[18]  The evoked cerebral potential and pain , 1984, Pain.

[19]  R. Dubner,et al.  Non-pain and pain sensations evoked by tooth pulp stimulation , 1983, Pain.

[20]  E. Chudler,et al.  The assessment of pain by cerebral evoked potentials , 1983, Pain.

[21]  P. Rohdewald,et al.  Evaluation of algesimetric parameters on the basis of tooth pulp stimulation in humans. , 1990, Anesthesia progress.

[22]  B. Matthews,et al.  Electrical stimulation of teeth , 1976, Pain.