Credit risk assessment using a multicriteria hierarchical discrimination approach: A comparative analysis

Corporate credit risk assessment decisions involve two major issues: the determination of the probability of default and the estimation of potential future benefits and losses for credit granting. The former issue is addressed by classifying the firms seeking credit into homogeneous groups representing different levels of credit risk. Classification/discrimination procedures commonly employed for such purposes include statistical and econometric techniques. This paper explores the performance of the M.H.DIS method (Multi-group Hierarchical DIScrimination), an alternative approach that originates from multicriteria decision aid (MCDA). The method is used to develop a credit risk assessment model using a large sample of firms derived from the loan portfolio of a leading Greek commercial bank. A total of 1411 firms are considered in both training and holdout samples using financial information through the period 1994–1997. A comparison with discriminant analysis (DA), logit analysis (LA) and probit analysis (PA) is also conducted to investigate the relative performance of the M.H.DIS method as opposed to traditional tools used for credit risk assessment. 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  CGX: An expert support system for credit granting , 1990 .

[2]  Robert A. McLean,et al.  Credit Risk Measurement: Developments over the Last 20 Years , 1998 .

[3]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Advances in multicriteria analysis , 1995 .

[4]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  Credit Granting: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Procedures , 1987 .

[5]  James A. Ohlson.  FINANCIAL RATIOS AND THE PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY , 1980 .

[6]  J. Courtis.  MODELLING A FINANCIAL RATIOS CATEGORIC FRAMEWORK , 1978 .

[7]  Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze,et al.  An Application of the UTA Discriminant Model for the Evaluation of R & D Projects , 1995 .

[8]  Sylvia Lane,et al.  Submarginal Credit Risk Classification , 1972 .

[9]  Edward I. Altman,et al.  Application of Classification Techniques in Business, Banking and Finance. , 1983 .

[10]  J. Siskos.  Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making , 1982 .

[11]  C. Zavgren.  ASSESSING THE VULNERABILITY TO FAILURE OF AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL FIRMS: A LOGISTIC ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[12]  Kenth Skogsvik,et al.  CURRENT COST ACCOUNTING RATIOS AS PREDICTORS OF BUSINESS FAILURE: THE SWEDISH CASE , 1990 .

[13]  Edward I. Altman,et al.  FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY , 1968 .

[14]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  Building additive utilities for multi-group hierarchical discrimination: the M.H.Dis method , 2000 .

[15]  M. Bardos.  Detecting the risk of company failure at the Banque de France , 1998 .

[16]  Panayiotis Theodossiou,et al.  FINANCIAL DISTRESS AND CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS: FURTHER EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1996 .

[17]  Vincent Mousseau,et al.  Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment Examples , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  A Multicriteria Decision Aid Methodology for Sorting Decision Problems: The Case of Financial Distress , 1999 .

[19]  Katherine Schipper,et al.  Application of Classification Techniques in Business, Banking and Finance. , 1983 .

[20]  Kevin Keasey,et al.  Multilogit approach to predicting corporate failure—Further analysis and the issue of signal consistency , 1990 .