Mobile Phones as Seismologic Sensors: Automating Data Extraction for the iShake System

There are a variety of approaches to seismic sensing, which range from collecting sparse measurements with high-fidelity seismic stations to non-quantitative, post-earthquake surveys. The sparse nature of the high-fidelity stations and the inaccuracy of the surveys create the need for a high-density, semi-quantitative approach to seismic sensing. To fill this void, the UC Berkeley iShake project designed a mobile client-backend server architecture that uses sensor-equipped mobile devices to measure earthquake ground shaking. iShake provides the general public with a service to more easily contribute more quantitatively significant data to earthquake research by automating the data collection and reporting mechanisms via the iShake mobile application. The devices act as distributed sensors that enable measurements to be taken and transmitted with a cellular network connection. Shaking table testing was used to assess the quality of the measurements obtained from the iPhones and iPods on a benchmark of 150 ground motions. Once triggered by a shaking event, the devices transmit sensor data to a backend server for further processing. After a seismic event is verified by high-fidelity stations, filtering algorithms are used to detect falling phones, as well as device-specific responses to the event. A method was developed to determine the absolute orientation of a device to estimate the direction of first motion of a seismic event. A “virtual earthquake” pilot test was conducted on the UC Berkeley campus to verify the operation of the iShake system. By designing and fully implementing a system architecture, developing signal processing techniques unique to mobile sensing, and conducting shaking table tests to confirm the validity of the sensing platform, the iShake project serves as foundational work for further studies in seismic sensing on mobile devices.

[1]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity , 2003 .

[2]  Andreas Krause,et al.  The next big one: Detecting earthquakes and other rare events from community-based sensors , 2011, Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[3]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  Consistency of Ground-Motion Estimates Made using System Identification , 2000 .

[4]  G. R. Pickett,et al.  Acoustic Character Logs and Their Applications in Formation Evaluation , 1963 .

[5]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Earthquake spectra and design , 1982 .

[6]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences , 2005 .

[7]  Hung-Chin Jang,et al.  A MANET Based Emergency Communication and Information System for Catastrophic Natural Disasters , 2009, 2009 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[8]  M. Hansen,et al.  Participatory Sensing , 2019, Internet of Things.

[9]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Conceptual framework of a remote wireless health monitoring system for large civil structures , 1998 .

[10]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  TriNet “ShakeMaps”: Rapid Generation of Peak Ground Motion and Intensity Maps for Earthquakes in Southern California , 1999 .

[11]  G. Atkinson,et al.  “Did You Feel It?” Intensity Data: A Surprisingly Good Measure of Earthquake Ground Motion , 2007 .

[12]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Crowdsourcing General Computation , 2011 .

[13]  Yang Zhang,et al.  CarTel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system , 2006, SenSys '06.

[14]  Ryan Newton,et al.  The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring , 2008, MobiSys '08.

[15]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A motion-stabilized outdoor augmented reality system , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[16]  T. Lay,et al.  Modern Global Seismology , 1995 .

[17]  H. D. Black,et al.  A passive system for determining the attitude of a satellite , 1964 .

[18]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Dynamic properties of solid waste based on back-analysis of OII landfill , 1998 .

[19]  Steve Frolking,et al.  A new model of Holocene peatland net primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation , 2010 .

[20]  E. Cochran,et al.  A novel strong-motion seismic network for community participation in earthquake monitoring , 2009, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[21]  Roxane Foulser-Piggott,et al.  Incorporation of the Spatial Correlation of Arias Intensity Within Earthquake Loss Estimation , 2010 .

[22]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[23]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Community Seismic Network , 2012 .

[24]  Gerhard Reitmayr,et al.  North-centred orientation tracking on mobile phones , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[25]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  iShake: mobile phones as seismic sensors -- user study findings , 2011, MUM.