Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis

BackgroundThe introduction of simulation into minimally invasive robotic surgery is relatively recent and has seen rapid advancement; therefore, a need exists to develop training curriculums and identify systems that will be most effective at training surgical skills. Several simulators have been introduced to support these aims—the daVinci skills simulator, Mimic dV-Trainer, Surgical Simulated Systems’ RoSS, and Simbionix Robotix Mentor. While multiple studies have been conducted to demonstrate the validity of these systems, studies comparing the perceived value of these devices as tools for education and skills are lacking.MethodsSubjects who qualified as medical students or physicians (n = 105) were assigned a specific order to use each of the three simulators. After completing a demographic questionnaire, participants performed one exercise on the three simulators and completed a second questionnaire regarding their experience with the device. After using all systems, they completed a final questionnaire, which detailed their comparative preferences. The subject’s performance metrics were also collected from each simulator.ResultsThe data confirmed the face, content, and construct validity for the dV-trainer and skills simulator. Similar validities could not be confirmed for the RoSS. >80 % of the time, participants chose the skills simulator in terms of physical comfort, ergonomics, and overall choice. However, only 55 % thought the skills simulator was worth the cost of the equipment. The dV-Trainer had the highest cost preference scores with 71 % of respondents feeling it was worth the investment.ConclusionsUsability can affect the consistency and commitment of users of robotic surgical simulators. In a previous study, these simulators were objectively reviewed and compared in terms of their system capabilities. Collectively, this work will offer end-users and potential buyers a comparison of the perceived value and preferences of robotic simulators.

[1]  T. Kesavadas,et al.  Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. , 2010, Urology.

[2]  Jaime Landman,et al.  Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. , 2011, Urology.

[3]  C. Lallas,et al.  Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. , 2012, Urology.

[4]  Jie Cai,et al.  Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Chandru P Sundaram,et al.  Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[6]  A. Moinzadeh,et al.  Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. , 2009, Urology.

[7]  Thomas S. Lendvay,et al.  Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator , 2008, Journal of robotic surgery.

[8]  Jennifer Priestley,et al.  Predictive Validity of a Training Protocol Using a Robotic Surgery Simulator , 2014, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Timothy M. Kowalewski,et al.  Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Validation of surgical simulators. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[11]  Jon C. Gould,et al.  Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  M. Lerner,et al.  Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[13]  I. Gill,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Joseph Barone,et al.  Initial experiences with RoSS surgical simulator in residency training: a validity and model analysis , 2013, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[15]  M. Schijven,et al.  Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Robotic Surgery , 2011, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[16]  K. Horvath,et al.  Methodologies for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies. , 2010, Surgery.

[17]  Thenkurussi Kesavadas,et al.  Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum--a multi-institution prospective study. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[18]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer® is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  Manuela Perez,et al.  Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool? , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[21]  T. Kesavadas,et al.  1512 DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND VALIDATION OF A SIMULATION-BASED CURRICULUM FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY , 2012 .

[22]  A. Meraney,et al.  da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. , 2012, Urology.

[23]  Isabel C. Green,et al.  A Pilot Study of Surgical Training Using a Virtual Robotic Surgery Simulator , 2013, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[24]  J. Cameron,et al.  William Stewart Halsted. Our surgical heritage. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[25]  Michael A Liss,et al.  Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education. , 2012, Journal of endourology.